Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 17;22:140. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03206-4

Table 2.

Risk factors to develop BI in patients with acute bronchiolitis

Risk factor No BI
(n = 500)
CA-BI
(n = 118)
HAI
(n = 57)
P1 P2 P3
Male gendera 303 (60.6) 64 (54.2) 32 (56.1) 0.206 0.813 0.515
Age in daysb 57 (27–109) 42 (25–92) 46 (24–74) 0.728 0.721 0.475
 < 3 months of agea 355 (71) 87 (73.7) 45 (78.9) 0.555 0.452 0.206
Previous comorbiditiesa 165 (33) 32 (27.1) 25 (43.9) 0.218 0.027 0.101
Comorbidity’s typesa
 Prematurity 119 (23.8) 23 (19.5) 17 (29.8) 0.317 0.127 0.316
 Respiratory 18 (3.6) 1 (0.8) 1 (1.8) 0.119 0.547 0.709
 Cardiologic 37 (7.4) 8 (6.8) 7 (12.3) 0.816 0.223 0.196
 Neurological 10 (2.0) 4 (3.4) 2 (3.5) 0.361 1.000 0.352
 Others 24 (4.8) 6 (5.1) 6 (10.5) 0.897 0.182 0.070
 BROSJOD# 9 (7–11) 10 (8–12) 10 (7.3–11)  < 0.001 0.184 0.296
 BROSJOD > 12a 36 (7.5) 20 (19.8) 5 (10.4)  < 0.001 0.152 0.480
 PRISM scaleb 3 (0–6) 3 (0–6) 3 (0–6)  < 0.001 0.513  < 0.001
Viral etiologya
 RSV 336 (67.2) 80 (67.8) 29 (50.9) 0.901 0.030 0.014
 Rhino/Enterovirus 121 (24.2) 27 (22.9) 14 (24.6) 0.763 0.806 0.952
 Metapneumovirus 21 (4.2) 5 (4.2) 1 (1.8) 0.986 0.665 0.716
 Influenza 26 (5.2) 3 (2.5) 3 (5.3) 0.219 0.393 1.000
 Viral co-infectiona 119 (23.8) 23 (19.5) 8 (14) 0.317 0.376 0.096
 Bacterial co-infectiona - 13 (11) 4 (7) - 0.587 -
Received treatmenta
 Nebulized treatment 411 (82.2) 94 (79.7) 43 (75.4) 0.521 0.525 0.213
 Endotracheal mucolytics 40 (8) 25 (21.2) 17 (29.8)  < 0.001 0.210  < 0.001
 Central linea 110 (22) 67 (56.8) 34 (59.6)  < 0.001 0.719  < 0.001
 Central line, daysb 9 (7–12.5) 8 (6.3–11) 11.8 (7.3–19) 0.453 0.001 0.003
 Urinary cathetera 134 (26.8) 65 (55.1) 39 (68.4)  < 0.001 0.092  < 0.001
 Urinary catheter, daysb 8.5 (6.3–10.9) 7.8 (6–10.5) 11 (7.1–16.5) 0.976 0.001 0.001

Comparisons made: P1: no BI vs. CA-BI; P2: CA-BI vs. HAI; P3: no BI vs. HAI

BI invasive bacterial infection, CA-BI community-acquired invasive bacterial infection, HAI hospital-acquired infection, PRISM Pediatric Risk Score of Mortality III scale, CMV conventional mechanical ventilation

aCategorical variable, expressed as frequency (%), and compared using Chi-square test

bContinuous variable, expressed as median (interquartile range), and compared using the Mann–Whitney test.