Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 17;145:105405. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105405

Table 8.

Results of MCDM with integration of ensemble.

Category Classifiers Relative Closeness Scores
Ensemble
Cm1 Cm2 Cm3 Soft
Hard
Avg.(Cmj) Rank Cm1P Cm2P Cm3P Total(CmjP) Rank
Asymptomatic Extra-Trees 1 0.806 0.701 0.835 1 10 10 6 26 2
SVM 0.478 0.370 0.535 0.461 7 3 4 4 11 8
RF 0.871 0.683 0.867 0.807 3 8 7 10 25 3
AdBoost 0.483 0.256 0.422 0.387 9 4 1 3 8 9
MLP 0.579 0.428 0.614 0.540 5 6 6 5 17 5
XGBoost 0.690 0.699 0.736 0.708 4 7 8 8 23 4
GBoost 0.314 0.351 0.807 0.490 6 2 2 9 13 6
LR 0.267 0.357 0.132 0.252 10 1 3 1 5 10
k-NN 0.561 0.405 0.262 0.409 8 5 5 2 12 7
HGBoost 0.920 0.806 0.736 0.821 2 9 10 8 27 1
Symptomatic Extra-Trees 0.947 0.790 0.772 0.836 1 10 10 8 28 1
SVM 0.515 0.484 0.647 0.548 8 5 4 4 13 7
RF 0.717 0.675 0.837 0.743 2 8 8 9 25 2
AdBoost 0.515 0.427 0.743 0.561 7 5 2 7 14 6
MLP 0.784 0.643 0.596 0.674 5 9 7 3 19 4
XGBoost 0.693 0.694 0.672 0.686 3 7 9 6 22 3
GBoost 0.514 0.626 0.915 0.685 4 3 6 10 19 4
LR 0.692 0.440 0.589 0.573 6 7 3 2 12 8
k-NN 0.457 0.511 0.362 0.443 9 2 5 1 8 9
HGBoost 0.176 0.467 0.662 0.435 10 1 1 5 7 10

-The underlined boldface indicates the highest-ranked models.