Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 10;23(1):39–64. doi: 10.1007/s40368-021-00635-0

Table 5.

Included studies on patient-reported outcomes following treatment

Study Study Design Severity of MIH Follow-up in
months (range)
Age of participants No. of participants (drop outs) No. of teeth Primary outcome measure Intervention Success

Jalevik and Klingberg (2012)

Sweden

Retrospective case control Severe 108 18 at time of review 72 (5) NR CFSS-DS to measure dental fear and anxiety, DVSS satisfaction with dental care, dental health and behaviour management problems by reviewing records. Measured at age 9 and 18 and compared with 41 controls

Over 9-year period

G1 MIH: restorations 26 (86%), extractions 7 (23%), both restorations and extractions 27 (90%)

G2 control: restorations 12 (32%), extractions 1 (3%), both restorations and extractions 12 32(%)

Increased dental fear and anxiety in MIH group at age 9

At age 9, 9 × more treatment in MIH group vs control. Overall 4.2 × more treatment vs control

Behaviour management problems higher in MIH group. No difference in satisfaction between groups

Hasmun et al. (2020)

UK

Prospective cohort NR 6

Mean 11

Range 7–16

103 (17) Mean 3.2 per participant OHRQoL using C-OHIP-SF19, SPCC physical appearance subscale, social acceptance subscale, global self-worth Microabrasion (4.65%), resin infiltration (4.65%), tooth whitening (4.65%), composite resin restoration (2.32%), microabrasion & resin infiltration (54%), microabrasion & tooth whitening (9.3%), tooth whitening & microabrasion and/or resin infiltration (7%)

Improvement C-OHIP-SF19 score from 47.4 to 59.8

Improvement in SPCC physical subscale appearance. No changes for social acceptance subscale or global self-worth

KEY: NR not reported, CFSS-D Children’s Fear Survey Schedule-Dental Subscale, DVSS Dental Visit Satisfaction Scale, C-OHIP-SF19 Child Oral Health Impact Profile-Short Form 19, SPCC Harter’s Self-Perception Profile for Children