Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 24;11(2):629–638. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00463-5

Table 2.

Comparison of vision and macular thickness at different time points between the innovator and biosimilar ranibizumab

Variable Innovator RBZ (n = 264) Biosimilar RBZ (n = 69) p value
BCVA comparisons (logMAR)
 Baseline 0.64 ± 0.39 0.71 ± 0.42 0.18
 1 month 0.48 ± 0.29** 0.55 ± 0.30** 0.32
 3 months 0.49 ± 0.39 0.49 ± 0.25 0.72
 6 months 0.47 ± 0.31 0.50 ± 0.29 0.61
 9 months 0.37 ± 0.32 (n = 134) 0.47 ± 0.27 (n = 41) 0.17
 12 months 0.38 ± 0.32 (n = 123) 0.44 ± 0.26 (n = 35) 0.25
Final visual acuity* 0.40 ± 0.36 0.44 ± 0.26 0.39
BCVA 0.24 ± 0.40 0.26 ± 0.34 0.71
% 3 line loss 18 (7%) 1 (1.5%) 0.14
% 3 line gain 114 (43%) 32 (46%) 0.63
CMT comparisons (μm)
 Baseline 457 ± 172 434 ± 153 0.40
 1 month 364 ± 152** 343 ± 126** 0.88
 3 months 334 ± 147** 306 ± 97** 0.51
 6 months 346 ± 162 326 ± 159 0.62
 9 months 342 ± 161 (n = 134) 316 ± 150 (n = 41) 0.45
 12 months 341 ± 161 (n = 134) 318 ± 150 (n = 41) 0.58
CMT final* 337 ± 160 328 ± 137 0.83
CMT 120 ± 196 105 ± 187 0.69

* Any time period

** p < 0.05 compared to previous time point

RBZ ranibizumab, CMT central macular thickness