Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 3;10:711938. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.711938

Table 5.

Summary of metaregression analysis outputs for the variables that influenced the proportion of fever and two more symptoms at suspicious patients of leptospirosis.

Variable Estimate 95% Confidence
interval
P -value
Intercept 1.2112 0.6162; 1.8063 <0.0001
Cross-sectional design −0.4977 −0.9996; 0.0042 0.0519
Longitudinal design −0.4417 −0.9374; 0.0540 0.0807
Asia −0.1736 −0.5625; 0.2153 0.3817
Europe 0.1286 −0.2859; 0.5431 0.5431
Latin-American and Caribbean −0.0075 −0.3493; 0.3342 0.9655
Serologic and molecular test 0.1421 −0.1940; 0.4783 0.4073
N −0.0001 −0.0002; −0.0000 0.0117
Positive Leptospira patients 0.0002 −0.0004; 0.0009 0.4356

tau2 (estimated amount of residual heterogeneity): 0.0649 (SE = 0.0260).

tau (square root of estimated tau2 value): 0.2547.

I2 (residual heterogeneity/unaccounted variability): 98.69%.

H2(unaccounted variability/sampling variability): 76.14.

R2(amount of heterogeneity accounted for): 9.69%.

Test for Residual Heterogeneity: QE(df = 13) = 1239.4682, p-val < 0.0001.

Test of Moderators (coefficient(s) 2:9): QM(df = 8) = 10.1535, p-val = 0.2544.