Table 5.
Performance comparison of single model and integrated framework on CSC dataset.
| Methods | Acc (%) | Spe (%) | Sen (%) | F1 (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base | Impro | Base | Impro | Base | Impro | Base | Impro | ||
| 5-way 3-shot | CSC-U | 94.90 | 95.09 | 96.32 | 96.08 | 79.40 | 84.25 | 72.30 | 74.20 |
| CSC-D | 94.52 | 94.46 | 96.08 | 95.56 | 77.48 | 82.45 | 70.33 | 71.38 | |
| CSC-S | 93.93 | 94.19 | 94.91 | 94.83 | 83.23 | 87.21 | 69.68 | 71.55 | |
| CSC-C | 94.06 | 94.82 | 96.57 | 96.96 | 66.63 | 71.45 | 65.30 | 69.83 | |
| 4-way 3-shot | CSC-U | 95.01 | 95.32 | 96.47 | 96.58 | 79.07 | 81.53 | 72.65 | 74.48 |
| CSC-D | 94.74 | 94.57 | 96.39 | 96.09 | 76.67 | 77.98 | 70.96 | 70.67 | |
| CSC-S | 93.83 | 94.84 | 94.79 | 95.90 | 83.31 | 83.30 | 69.35 | 73.03 | |
| CSC-C | 94.26 | 94.87 | 96.77 | 96.94 | 66.90 | 72.28 | 66.17 | 70.28 | |
| 3-way 3-shot | CSC-U | 95.07 | 95.19 | 96.62 | 96.34 | 78.09 | 82.63 | 72.64 | 74.24 |
| CSC-D | 94.60 | 94.49 | 96.39 | 96.07 | 74.98 | 77.23 | 69.94 | 70.16 | |
| CSC-S | 94.29 | 94.54 | 95.37 | 95.31 | 82.47 | 86.06 | 70.78 | 72.53 | |
| CSC-C | 94.12 | 94.77 | 96.91 | 96.67 | 63.61 | 73.93 | 64.45 | 70.31 | |
| 3-way 4-shot | CSC-U | 95.18 | 95.06 | 96.76 | 96.10 | 77.82 | 83.72 | 73.01 | 73.97 |
| CSC-D | 94.72 | 94.27 | 96.43 | 95.49 | 76.05 | 80.84 | 70.73 | 70.27 | |
| CSC-S | 94.43 | 94.43 | 95.66 | 95.17 | 81.02 | 86.35 | 70.93 | 72.22 | |
| CSC-C | 94.23 | 94.83 | 97.03 | 97.05 | 63.53 | 70.56 | 64.85 | 69.60 | |
| 3-way 5-shot | CSC-U | 94.85 | 94.67 | 96.17 | 95.45 | 80.33 | 86.19 | 72.33 | 73.06 |
| CSC-D | 94.36 | 93.93 | 95.93 | 94.86 | 77.21 | 83.68 | 69.66 | 69.79 | |
| CSC-S | 93.92 | 93.77 | 94.79 | 94.23 | 84.40 | 88.78 | 69.95 | 70.50 | |
| CSC-C | 94.07 | 94.78 | 96.44 | 96.56 | 68.16 | 75.35 | 65.84 | 70.77 | |
The bold values indicate the maximum value of the corresponding metric in the manuscript.