Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 17;22:75. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01641-0

Table 2.

Association between education and high allostatic load presented as prevalence ratios (PRs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs), among 4177 participants, using NHANES weighting an estimated 9,494,904 US Black women

No. (weighted %)a Prevalence ratios (95% confidence interval)
Crude Model 1b Model 2c Model 3d
Education level
Less than high school (Referent) 443 (25.3) 1.000 (Referent) 1.000 (Referent) 1.000 (Referent) 1.000 (Referent)
High school/GED 393 (24.1) 0.850 (0.849–0.850) 0.946 (0.937–0.954) 0.932 (0.925–0.940) 0.926 (0.920–0.933)
Some college or associates degree 546 (35.3) 0.858 (0.857–0.859) 0.959 (0.952–0.967) 1.005 (0.993–1.017) 1.027 (1.013–1.041)
College graduate or higher 226 (15.3) 0.746 (0.738–0.753) 0.758 (0.750–0.767) 0.835 (0.819–0.851) 0.857 (0.839–0.876)

Prevalence ratios for high allostatic load are estimated using modified Poisson regression with robust variance estimation and accounting for NHANES weighting. Confidence intervals estimated using delete-1 jackknife method accounting for complex statistical weighting, cluster, and strata

aNumber of participants with high allostatic load per stratum (weighted stratum proportion with high allostatic load)

bModel 1: Adjusted for age only

cModel 2: Additionally adjusted for total number of pregnancies, age at menarche, and poverty to income ratio,

dModel 3: Additionally adjusted for depressive disorder, smoker status, ever congestive heart failure, and ever heart attack