TABLE 4.

ANOVAs comparing the men-related to the matched other-specialty journal: study 1.

	Favorability (df: 1, 107)					Quality (df: 1, 105)					Subscription recommendations (df: 1, 107)
	F	p	d	M	SD	F	p	d	M	SD	F	p	d	M	SD
Gender	0.64	0.426	−0.15	–	–	0.86	0.355	0.18	–	–	0.17	0.685	−0.08	–	–
Men	–	–	–	4.36	0.80	–	–	–	65.39	24.26	–	–	–	60.19	23.77
Women	–	–	–	4.47	0.68	–	–	–	60.68	27.78	–	–	–	61.82	18.03
Journal	19.92	<0.001	0.52	–	–	31.08	<0.001	0.42	–	–	13.68	<0.001	0.47	–	–
Men-related	–	–	–	4.18	0.99	–	–	–	56.96	28.03	–	–	–	54.52	28.62
Matched other-specialty	–	–	–	4.66	0.86	–	–	–	68.89	28.68	–	–	–	67.57	26.76
Gender × Journal	0.36	0.551	–	–	–	0.03	0.859	–	–	–	0.33	0.564	–	–	–
Men’s evaluations	7.86	0.007	0.44	–	–	13.75	<0.001	0.43	–	–	4.54	0.038	0.36	–	–
Men-related	–	–	–	4.15	1.03	–	–	–	59.62	27.20	–	–	–	54.72	31.43
Matched other-specialty	–	–	–	4.57	0.89	–	–	–	71.16	26.14	–	–	–	65.65	28.75
Women’s evaluations	12.40	<0.001	0.61	–	–	17.54	<0.001	0.41	–	–	9.81	0.003	0.59	–	–
Men-related	–	–	–	4.20	0.96	–	–	–	54.53	28.80	–	–	–	54.33	26.08
Matched other-specialty	–	–	–	4.75	0.83	–	–	–	66.83	30.91	–	–	–	69.32	24.94