TABLE 5.
ANOVAs comparing men-related to the sex/gender-related journals: study 1.
| Favorability (df: 1, 107) | Quality (df: 1, 105) | Subscription recommendations (df: 1, 107) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| F | p | d | M | SD | F | p | d | M | SD | F | p | d | M | SD | |
| Gender | 3.78 | 0.055 | −0.36 | – | – | 0.41 | 0.525 | 0.12 | – | – | 0.84 | 0.363 | −0.16 | – | – |
| Men | – | – | – | 3.91 | 0.92 | – | – | – | 57.53 | 23.89 | – | – | – | 50.99 | 22.59 |
| Women | – | – | – | 4.22 | 0.79 | – | – | – | 54.48 | 26.65 | – | – | – | 54.47 | 20.48 |
| Journal | 8.02 | 0.006 | 0.22 | – | – | 1.69 | 0.197 | 0.08 | – | – | 1.57 | 0.213 | 0.12 | – | – |
| Men-related | – | – | – | 4.18 | 0.99 | – | – | – | 56.96 | 28.03 | – | – | – | 54.52 | 28.62 |
| Sex/gender-related | – | – | – | 3.97 | 0.94 | – | – | – | 54.80 | 25.83 | – | – | – | 51.42 | 22.07 |
| Gender × Journal | 12.50 | <0.001 | – | – | – | 1.25 | 0.266 | – | – | – | 2.51 | 0.116 | – | – | – |
| Men’s evaluations | 18.70 | <0.001 | 0.49 | – | – | 2.30 | 0.136 | 0.16 | – | – | 3.29 | 0.075 | 0.28 | – | – |
| Men-related | – | – | – | 4.15 | 1.03 | – | – | – | 59.62 | 27.20 | – | – | – | 54.72 | 31.43 |
| Sex/gender-related | – | – | – | 3.66 | 0.97 | – | – | – | 55.44 | 24.40 | – | – | – | 47.27 | 21.69 |
| Women’s evaluations | 0.27 | 0.606 | −0.06 | – | – | 0.02 | 0.885 | 0.01 | – | – | 0.07 | 0.795 | −0.04 | – | – |
| Men-related | – | – | – | 4.20 | 0.96 | – | – | – | 54.53 | 28.80 | – | – | – | 54.33 | 26.08 |
| Sex/gender-related | – | – | – | 4.25 | 0.81 | – | – | – | 54.22 | 27.28 | – | – | – | 55.21 | 21.91 |