TABLE 9.
ANOVAs comparing articles published in sex/gender-related versus other matched specialty journals: Study 3.
| Overall Comparisons | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Journal Comparisons from Study 1 (df: 1, 398) |
Journal Comparisons from Study 2 (df: 1, 398) |
|||||||||||||||||||
| F | p | d | M | SD | F | p | d | M | SD | |||||||||||
| Journal type | 1.19 | 0.276 | 0.109 | – | – | 95.59 | <0.001 | −0.978 | – | – | ||||||||||
| Sex/gender-related | – | – | – | 134.67 | 154.43 | – | – | – | 134.67a | 154.43 | ||||||||||
| Other-specialty | – | – | – | 161.68 | 313.86 | – | – | – | 18.77b | 65.26 | ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Comparisons by Journal | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Women and Therapy Comparisons (df: 2, 147) | Feminism and Psychology comparisons (df: 2, 147) | Sex Roles Comparisons (df: 2, 147) | Psychology of Women Quarterly (df: 2, 147) Comparisons | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| F | p | ds | M | SD | F | p | ds | M | SD | F | p | ds | M | SD | F | p | ds | M | SD | |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Journal Type | 12.58 | <0.001 | −0.523 to 0.482 | – | – | 33.18 | <0.001 | −1.326 to 0.690 | – | – | 32.92 | <0.001 | −1.541 to 0.113 | – | – | 50.35 | <0.001 | −2.300 to 1.610 | – | – |
| Sex/gender-related | – | – | – | 20.10a | 24.57 | – | – | – | 63.32a | 62.51 | – | – | – | 303.28a | 195.34 | – | – | – | 151.98a | 79.28 |
| Study 1 other-specialty | – | – | – | 8.82b | 18.11 | – | – | – | 15.52b | 22.06 | – | – | – | 104.50b | 163.81 | – | – | – | 517.88b | 440.41 |
| Study 2 other-specialty | – | – | – | 2.44b | 4.67 | – | – | – | 4.64b | 3.24 | – | – | – | 52.44b | 121.92 | – | – | – | 15.54c | 27.49 |
Different subscripts within a dependent measure differ from each other, p < 0.05. The convention of Cohen’s d was used: <0.20 a small effect, 0.20 to 0.80 a moderate effect, >0.80 a large effect. Effect sizes with positive numbers indicate differences favoring other-specialty journals.