Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 16;12(3):e052481. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052481

Table 1.

Consecutive time periods of EMS urgent missions according to the two clustered emergency case cohorts for 21 878 transported patients

EMS intervals Emergency
type
Male Female
n Median (IQR) n Median (IQR)*
Response time HUM
emergencies
8686 17.0 (12.5–23.2) 6912 17.0 (12.6–23.1)
HUT
emergencies
5768 15.7 (11.2–22.0) 512 15.6 (11.5–21.5)
On-scene time HUM
emergencies
8686 20.0 (13.0–29.0) 6912 23.0 (16.0–31.0)†
HUT
emergencies
5768 15.0 (9.0–21.0) 512 15.0 (10.0–22.0)
Travel time HUM
emergencies
8686 18.0 (10.0–29.0) 6912 19.0 (11.0–31.0)†
HUT
emergencies
5768 19.0 (11.0–30.0) 512 18.0 (12.0–30.0)
Hospital time HUM
emergencies
8686 17.0 (6.0–27.0) 6912 16.0 (5.0–27.0)
HUT
emergencies
5768 18.0 (6.0–28.0) 512 17.0 (6.0–29.0)
Total EMS
time
HUM
emergencies
8686 79.3 (63.7–97.1) 6912 82.8 (67.0–99.8)†
HUT
emergencies
5768 73.8 (58.0–92.3) 512 74.7 (60.8–91.5)

*Mann-Whitney U Test

†Statistically significant difference at a p value of <0.05

EMS, emergency medical services; HUM, highly urgent medical; HUT, highly urgent trauma.