TABLE 4.
The GWAS enrichment for DEGs in different groups and modules.
| Trait | Group/module | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| A | ||
| CW | birth_adult | 0.0039 |
| LMW | birth_adult | 0.0066 |
| B | ||
| MS | up_fold_01 | 0.0031 |
| SW | down_fold_314 | 0.0110 |
| C | ||
| LMW | up_fold_12 | 0.0042 |
| CW | up_fold_12 | 0.0020 |
| REA | up_fold_12 | 0.0002 |
| BFT | down_fold_12 | 0.0471 |
| D | ||
| CW | Turquoise | 0.0232 |
| REA | Turquoise | 0.0322 |
| LMW | Turquoise | 0.0296 |
| CW | Lightgreen | 0.0231 |
A. The three periods are compared in pairs. B. In birth_youth comparison, DEGs were divided into upregulated and downregulated genes, which were further divided into up/down_fold_01, up/down_fold_12, up/down_fold_23, and up/down_fold_3x according to fold change. C. In birth_adult comparison, the grouping principle is the same as that of B. D. DEGs were segmented by modules.