Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 20;68(2):73–85. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2019.1706333

Table 1.

Studies included in the review of the effectiveness of socially assistive robotics (SARs) in intervention programs for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD): characteristics of the study populations (independent variables)

Number Study Participants (number) Robot Age (years) IQ Gender (boys:girls)
1 Severson et al. (2008) 11 AIBO 5–8 NS 10:1
2 Feil-Seifer and Mataric (2011) 8 Bandit 5–10 NS NS
3 Hanafiah et al. (2012) 1 NAO 10 107 1:0
4 Kim et al. (2012) 18 Pleo 9–14 NS 15:3
5 Costa et al. (2013) 8 Kaspar 6–10 NS 8:0
6 Huskens et al. (2013) 6 NAO 8–14 85–111 6:0
7 Kim et al. (2013) 24 Pleo 4–12 ≥70 21:3
8 Yussof et al. (2013) 2 NAO 6–9 NS 2:0
9 Pop et al. (2014) 11 Probo 4–7  NS 11:0
10 Wainer et al. (2014) 6 Kaspar 8–9 NS 5:1
11 Conti et al. (2015) 3 NAO 11–12 Mild  ID/Severe ID 3:0
12 Costa et al. (2015) 8 Kaspar 6–9 NS 8:0
13 Scassellati et al. (2018) 12 Jibo 6 – 12 ≥70 7:5