Skip to main content
. 2020 May 1;87(1):E16–E22. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa092

TABLE.

Patient and Aneurysm Characteristics

Patient Age sex Aneurysm location H&H Aneurysm width (mm) Aneurysm height (mm) Neck width (mm) Route WEB SL Degree of stasisa Six-mo follow-up angiogram
1 58F VBJ 5 14 10 9 Femoral 11 × 9 and 11 × 8 Complete occlusion N/A
2 61F PComm 3 6 3 2 Femoral 4 × 3 Venous Aneurysm remnant
3 66F Basilar apex 4 3.5 3.9 2.5 Femoral 4 × 3 Arterial N/A
4 81F MCA 4 3.3 4.3 2.4 Carotid puncture 4 × 3 Venous N/A
5 76F AComm (Figure 1) 3 5.2 4.8 5.2 Radial 5 × 3 Complete occlusion Complete occlusion
6 81F AComm 4 5.5 4.7 4.5 Femoral 5 × 4 Capillary Complete occlusion
7 79F Bilobed PICA (Figure 3) 3 #1: 3.68 #2: 5.17 #1: 7.85 #2: 5.1 #1: 3.7 #2: 4.1 Radial #1: 4 × 3 #2: 5 × 4 Complete occlusionb Complete occlusion
8 49M #1: carotid ophthalmic #2: basilar tip 3 #1: 4.9 #2: 5.4 #1: 6.25 #2: 7.65 #1: 5.68 #2: 5.18 Femoral #1: 7 × 4 #2: 6 × 5 #1: capillary #2: venous N/A
9 47F Basilar tip 4 6.3 8.99 4.15 Femoral 8 × 4 Venous N/A

aEvaluation of degree of stasis as described by O’Kelly et al.9

bIpsilateral vertebral artery deconstruction.