Table 6.
Correlation of mir155 with Periodontal Microorganisms among Groups.
Microorganisms | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
mir155 | mir155 | mir155 | mir155 | ||
BOP | Corelation | 0.013 | –0.123 | –0.079 | –0.019 |
p-value | 0.004 * | 0.255 | 0.626 | 0.821 | |
PI | Corelation | –0.010 | –0.199 | –0.019 | 0.048 |
p-value | 0.513 | 0.160 | 0.313 | 0.030 * | |
PPD | Corelation | 0.042 | –0.042 | 0.066 | –0.016 |
p-value | 0.037 * | 0.510 | 0.033 * | 0.638 | |
CAL | Corelation | 0.029 | –0.014 | 0.008 | –0.005 |
p-value | 0.410 | 0.489 | 0.045 * | 0.950 | |
p g | Corelation | –0.062 | –0.054 | –0.082 | –0.054 |
p-value | 0.463 | 0.524 | 0.332 | 0.524 | |
T f | Corelation | –0.008 | –0.054 | 0.068 | –0.080 |
p-value | 0.920 | 0.524 | 0.425 | 0.341 | |
T d | Corelation | –0.052 | –0.043 | –0.043 | –0.065 |
p-value | 0.538 | 0.613 | 0.613 | 0.440 | |
F n | Corelation | –0.082 | –0.042 | 0.051 | –0.166 |
p-value | 0.332 | 0.619 | 0.045 * | 0.047 * | |
p i | Corelation | –0.025 | –0.082 | –0.121 | –0.082 |
p-value | 0.767 | 0.330 | 0.152 | 0.330 | |
HSV | Corelation | 0.072 | 0.073 | 0.076 | 0.071 |
p-value | 0.039 * | 0.039 * | 0.041 * | 0.039 * | |
EBV | Corelation | 0.052 | 0.133 | 0.054 | –0.090 |
p-value | 0.536 | 0.112 | 0.322 | 0.285 | |
HCMV | Corelation | 0.027 | 0.027 | 0.027 | 0.072 |
p-value | 0.752 | 0.752 | 0.752 | 0.394 |
* —Significant. p-value ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant. Tannerella forsythia (Tf), Treponema denticola (Td), Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg), Prevotella intermedia (Pi), Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn). Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV), Ebstein Barr Virus (EBV), and Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV). Controls–systemically and periodontally healthy pregnant women. Group A–systemically healthy pregnant women with chronic periodontitis. Group B–preeclamptic pregnant women with chronic periodontitis. Group C–preeclamptic pregnant women without chronic periodontitis.