Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021 Aug 11;41(5):1076–1086. doi: 10.1111/opo.12853

Table 2.

Vitreous chamber depth of the Amber Filter and Amber Goggle animals compared with the standard colony lighting animals (Ward et al., 2018).

DVE Colony (C) (n=7) Filter (F) (n=8) Goggle (G) (n=7) One-way ANOVA (p-value) Unpaired t-test (adjusted p-value)
Mean SEM Mean SEM Mean SEM C v F C v G F v G
24 2.88 0.03 2.86 0.02 2.86 0.01 0.76
25 2.88 0.03 2.85 0.02 2.86 0.01
26 2.84 0.02 2.85 0.01
27 2.83 0.02 2.87 0.01
28 2.82 0.02 2.86 0.02
29 2.80 0.02 2.88 0.02
30 2.80 0.02 2.87 0.02
31 2.80 0.02 2.85 0.03
32 2.80 0.02 2.88 0.02
33 2.79 0.02 2.86 0.03
34 2.85 0.03 2.78 0.02 2.87 0.02
35 2.85 0.03 2.78 0.02 2.87 0.02 0.02 0.08 0.56 0.02

Mixed ANOVA: DVE*Group: F2,81 = 3.43, p = 0.04

All values are millimeters (mm); DVE: Days of Visual Experience

Unadjusted p = 0.04