Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 10;2022:6384742. doi: 10.1155/2022/6384742

Table 3.

Intergenomic distance of isolate “IITK SM2” with different strains of Citrobacter using digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) analysis. Recommended formula 2α was used for estimating the intergenomic distance. Accession numbers of strains used in this analysis are detailed in Table S4 of the Supporting Information.

Type of strain dDDH value (%) GC content difference (%)
Citrobacter youngae NCTC 13708 85.8 0.10
Citrobacter youngae 30791 83.8 0.09
Citrobacter pasteurii CIP 55.13 60.7 0.10
Citrobacter freundii FDAARGOS 549 42.0 0.03
Citrobacter freundii NBRC 12681 41.9 0.04
Citrobacter portucalensis A60 39.2 0.31
Citrobacter europaeus 97/79 39.0 0.18
Citrobacter braakii ATCC 51113 38.9 0.20
Citrobacter cronae Tue2-1 36.7 0.71
Citrobacter werkmanii NBRC 105721 36.4 0.37
Citrobacter tructae SNU WT2 32.9 0.25
Citrobacter koseri NCTC 10786 26.4 2.10
Citrobacter amalonaticus NCTC 10805 25.2 1.73
Citrobacter rodentium NBRC 105723 24.7 2.94
Citrobacter sedlakii NBRC 105722 24.4 3.01

α [51].