TABLE 1.

Combined pulses – Area under the curve¹.

Contrast	Difference (natural log scale)			Ratio
	Mean2	SE3	P-value4	Estimate5	95% CI6
					Lower	Upper
DMSO to Saline	0.636	0.745	0.396	1.889	0.429	8.320
L-THA to Saline	1.741	0.617	0.006	5.706	1.670	19.490
TFB-TBOA to Saline	0.998	0.771	0.200	2.713	0.583	12.616
TFB-TBOA + L-THA to Saline	0.151	0.730	0.836	1.163	0.272	4.979
TFB-TBOA + L-THA to L-THA	–1.590	0.633	0.014	0.204	0.058	0.721
Receptor Ant. to Saline	0.251	0.857	0.771	1.285	0.233	7.090
Receptor Ant. + L-THA to Saline	1.456	0.775	0.064	4.288	0.916	20.080
Receptor Ant. + L-THA to L-THA	–0.286	0.685	0.678	0.751	0.192	2.940
BAPTA to Saline	1.054	0.696	0.134	2.868	0.716	11.480
BAPTA to L-THA	–0.688	0.594	0.251	0.503	0.154	1.640
YM to DMSO	0.446	0.731	0.544	1.562	0.364	6.690
YM + L-THA to DMSO	0.750	0.730	0.308	2.116	0.494	9.060
YM + L-THA-D to L-THA-Saline	–0.992	0.956	0.303	0.371	0.055	2.490
KB to DMSO	0.049	0.756	0.949	1.050	0.233	4.740
KB + L-THA to DMSO	0.781	0.705	0.272	2.184	0.536	8.890
KB + L-THA-D to L-THA-Saline	–0.961	0.937	0.309	0.383	0.059	2.470
NPA to Saline	1.367	0.734	0.066	3.923	0.909	16.930
NPA + L-THA to Saline	0.699	0.733	0.343	2.012	0.467	8.670
NPA + L-THA to L-THA	–1.042	0.637	0.106	0.353	0.099	1.250
Indo to DMSO	1.038	0.686	0.134	2.824	0.720	11.080
Indo + L-THA to DMSO	0.422	0.726	0.563	1.525	0.359	6.480
Indo + L-THA-D to L-THA-Saline	–1.320	0.953	0.170	0.267	0.040	1.780

¹Results based on a mixed effects model using the natural log of AUC as the outcome and including all experimental conditions; ²Difference of means (natural log scale), equivalently ln(Ratio); ³Standard error; ⁴P-value for Wald test; ⁵Exponentiated Difference of Means; ⁶95% confidence interval.