Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 4;13:848728. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.848728

Table 1.

Statistical analysis of MCHR1 in the presence of different MRAP2 mutants in response to MCH.

Data statistics of Figures 6A–H LogEC50 p-value comparison
vs. receptor alone vs. MRAP2 WT
MCHR1 alone −8.149 ± 0.10 <0.0001
MCHR1:MRAP2 WT −7.061 ± 0.40 <0.0001
MCHR1:MRAP2 Δ4–11 −7.242 ± 0.19 <0.0001 <0.0001
MCHR1:MRAP2 Δ12–25 −6.765 ± 1.15 <0.0001 0.9803
MCHR1:MRAP2 Δ26–35 −7.551 ± 0.31 <0.0001 <0.0001
MCHR1:MRAP2 Δ36–45 −6.643 ± 0.43 <0.0001 0.8704
MCHR1:MRAP2 Δct −7.515 ± 0.54 <0.0001 <0.0001
MCHR1:MRAP2 t97 −7.338 ± 0.68 <0.0001 <0.0001
MCHR1:MRAP2 t118 −7.593 ± 0.63 <0.0001 <0.0001
MCHR1:MRAP2 t143 −7.599 ± 0.46 <0.0001 <0.0001

Values were expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. of at least three independent experiments. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey post-test was applied in the statistical analysis.