Table 1.
Data statistics of Figures 6A–H | LogEC50 | p-value comparison | |
---|---|---|---|
vs. receptor alone | vs. MRAP2 WT | ||
MCHR1 alone | −8.149 ± 0.10 | – | <0.0001 |
MCHR1:MRAP2 WT | −7.061 ± 0.40 | <0.0001 | – |
MCHR1:MRAP2 Δ4–11 | −7.242 ± 0.19 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
MCHR1:MRAP2 Δ12–25 | −6.765 ± 1.15 | <0.0001 | 0.9803 |
MCHR1:MRAP2 Δ26–35 | −7.551 ± 0.31 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
MCHR1:MRAP2 Δ36–45 | −6.643 ± 0.43 | <0.0001 | 0.8704 |
MCHR1:MRAP2 Δct | −7.515 ± 0.54 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
MCHR1:MRAP2 t97 | −7.338 ± 0.68 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
MCHR1:MRAP2 t118 | −7.593 ± 0.63 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
MCHR1:MRAP2 t143 | −7.599 ± 0.46 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
Values were expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. of at least three independent experiments. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey post-test was applied in the statistical analysis.