Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 4;10:807139. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.807139

TABLE 8.

Threshold method results for TOS and SWS compared with VS for skin site.

Arm Wrist
+ve VS cycles 118 40
−ve VS cycles 36 11
Total cycles 154 51
Participants 60 20
Thresholds ±1 day ±3 days ±1 day ±3 days
Method TOS SWS TOS SWS TOS SWS TOS SWS
TP 61 61 87 103 25 27 32 37
FP 41 52 15 10 12 11 5 1
TN 33 34 33 34 10 11 10 11
FN 19 7 19 7 4 2 4 2
Total cycles 154 154 154 154 51 51 51 51
Sensitivity 76% 90% 82% 94% 86% 93% 89% 95%
Specificity 45% 40% 69% 77% 45% 50% 67% 92%
PPV 60% 54% 85% 91% 68% 71% 86% 97%
NPV 63% 83% 63% 83% 71% 85% 71% 85%
Accuracy 61.0% 61.7% 77.9% 89.0% 68.6% 74.5% 82.4% 94.1%
Upper CI 95% 68.8% 69.4% 84.2% 93.4% 80.9% 85.7% 91.6% 98.8%
Lower CI 95% 52.9% 53.5% 70.5% 82.9% 54.1% 60.4% 69.1% 83.8%
F score 0.67 0.67 0.84 0.92 0.76 0.81 0.88 0.96
Upper CI 95% 0.77 0.77 0.90 0.97 0.89 0.92 0.96 1.00
Lower CI 95% 0.56 0.57 0.75 0.86 0.58 0.63 0.73 0.84

Note. TP, true positive; FP, false positive; TN, true negative; FN, false negative; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.