Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 17;139(11):1670–1683. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021013972

Table 1.

Patient characteristics at enrollment

P-ML ID Age, y Sex Cytogenetic abnormalities HCT
donor*
HCT
KIR (GvH)
HCT
KIR (HvG)
Time to relapse after HCT Post-HCT salvage therapies, n T-cell donor engraftment, % Blasts in BM at enrollment, %
2 1.5 M t:RUNX1 Haplo Match Match 90 d 2 100 4
3 28 F Tetraploidy Haplo Mismatch Match 1 y 0 NA 70
4 7 M NUP98,
FLT3-ITD
Haplo Match Mismatch 60 d 1 90 45
5 21 F −5q, MECOM MUD Match Match 150 d 4 NA 10
7 9 F −5q MSD Match Match 3 y 3 95 62
8 2 F MECOM MSD Match Match 100 d 2 77 11
9 11 F T(11:17) MUD/haplo Match Mismatch 160 d
After HCT 2
2 100 15
10 1.5 F KMT2A:MLLT3 Haplo Mismatch Match 60 d 1 100 82
11 4 M NUP98 MUD/MUD Match Match 100 d
after HCT 2
4 100 35
Average
(range)
9.4
(1.5-22)
3 M
6 F
5× Haplo
2× MUD
2× MSD
242 d after HCT
(60-1095 d)
2
(0-4)
96
(77-100)
37
(4-82)

Included are baseline characteristics, transplant history, and prior treatment history of all patients enrolled on the clinical trial who received ML NK cell immunotherapy.

F, female; GvH, graft-versus-host; haplo, haploidentical; HCT, hematopoietic cell transplant; HvG, host-versus-graft; M, male; MSD, matched sibling donor; MUD, matched unrelated donor; NA, not available.

*

For patients who underwent 2 transplants before enrollment, donors are list as 1st HCT/2nd HCT.

T-cell engraftment was not available for these 2 patients. Both had bone marrow tested for donor engraftment. P-ML003 had 5% donor engraftment in bone marrow and P-ML005 had 100% donor engraftment in bone marrow.