Tollefson 1992.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | DESIGN Description: randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group flexible‐dose design with a 1‐week placebo run‐in BLINDING Participants: unclear Assessors: yes Administrators: unclear ALLOCATION CONCEALMENT Method: unclear RANDOMIZATION Method: unclear | |
Participants | SAMPLE Description: 51 DSM‐III GAD with concurrent alcohol dependence/abuse referred from chemical dependence treatment programmes, 27.5% female, mean age: 38.4 years, baseline HAM‐A score: approximately 25 (from figure 2 in article) SCREENING Primary diagnosis: SCID, HAM‐A score > 18, HAM‐D score < 18, abstinence from alcohol consumption for at least 30 and not more than 90 days Comorbidity: SCID | |
Interventions | Buspirone 15 mg/day (week 1), ≥ 30 mg/day (week 2) to maximum 60 mg/day (3‐4 week, after which held constant) versus placebo x 24 weeks | |
Outcomes | Primary outcomes: HAM‐A treatment response (≥ 30% reduction on HAM‐A total score and score < 18 = responders; ≥ 30% reduction on HAM‐A total score only = partial responders; otherwise classified as non‐responders), CGI Secondary outcomes: ASI, HAM‐D Data estimation: LOCF from 4 weeks for efficacy analyses | |
Notes | INDUSTRY SUPPORT Industry funded: yes Medication provided by industry: unclear Any of the authors work for industry: no ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Drop‐out rates: 16/26 (61.5%) participants in buspirone and 21/25 (84%) in placebo groups | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "subjects were randomised to either buspirone or placebo" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information on allocation is provided in report |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Study described as "double‐blinded", but no information provided on who was blinded |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "anxiolytic efficacy was determined by blinded HAM‐A score reduction" |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Although the proportion of participants who dropped at by 4 weeks was similar between groups (4/26 for buspirone and 5/25 for placebo), there were more drop‐outs by study endpoint in the placebo (21/25 participants) than buspirone group (16/26 participants), with significantly more people in the placebo group dropping out due to lack of efficacy or worsening of symptoms accounting for this difference. Unfortunately, while the authors confirm in the study report that there was no difference in demographics or ratings on the Cloninger personality scale between all 51 randomized participants and the participants who completed at least 4 weeks of treatment, they did not report a similar analysis for study endpoint |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Only reported examples of items on questionnaires such as the ASI that were significantly different between groups, without indicating how many comparisons were conducted altogether |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Prior benzodiazepine exposure was greater in the buspirone than the placebo group, which may predict a less robust response to buspirone. The trial was industry funded Quote: "the authors wish to acknowledge..[ ]..a concept grant from Mead‐Johnson Pharmaceuticals |
ADS: Alcoholism Dependency Scale ; ANCOVA: analysis of covariance; ANOVA: analysis of variance; ASI: Addiction Severity Index; BDI: Beck Depression Inventory; CAPS: Clinician Administered PTSD Scale; CBT: cognitive behaviour therapy; CGI: Clinical Global Impressions scale; DSM: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual; GAD: generalized anxiety disorder; HAM‐A: Hamilton Anxiety scale; HAM‐D: Hamilton Depression scale; IES: Impact of Event Scale; LSAS: Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (Clinician administered); LSAS‐SR: Liebowitz Social Anxiety (Self Report); MATCH: Matching Alcoholism Treatment to Client Heterogeneity; MDD: major depressive disorder; MINI: Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview; MISS: Civilian Mississippi Scales for PTSD; OCDS: Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale; PTSD: post‐traumatic stress disorder; SAC: The Substance Abuse Calendar; SAD: social anxiety disorder; SCID: Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐IV; SPIN: Social Phobia Inventory; TLFB: Timeline Followback scale.