Table 3.
Postintervention feedback ratings from participants who were retained at time point 1 (t1), both overall and for each intervention arm (N=233).
| Feedback ratings | Overall n (%) | Study arm n (%) | P valuea | |||||
|
|
|
CSb (n=79) | WWc (n=76) | BRd (n=78) |
|
|||
| Design of intervention | .16 | |||||||
|
|
Dull, not fun | 1 (0.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.3) |
|
||
|
|
Mostly boring | 14 (6) | 1 (1.3) | 7 (9.2) | 6 (7.7) |
|
||
|
|
OK, fun enough | 55 (23.6) | 17 (21.5) | 15 (19.7) | 23 (29.5) |
|
||
|
|
Moderately interesting and fun | 103 (44.2) | 41 (51.9) | 32 (42.1) | 30 (38.5) |
|
||
|
|
Highly interesting and fun | 60 (25.8) | 20 (25.3) | 22 (28.9) | 18 (23.1) |
|
||
| Content of intervention | .46 | |||||||
|
|
Dull, not fun | 3 (1.3) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.3) | 2 (2.6) |
|
||
|
|
Mostly boring | 11 (4.7) | 2 (2.5) | 5 (6.6) | 4 (5.1) |
|
||
|
|
OK, fun enough | 46 (19.7) | 13 (16.5) | 13 (17.1) | 20 (25.6) |
|
||
|
|
Moderately interesting and fun | 94 (40.3) | 35 (44.3) | 28 (36.8) | 31 (39.7) |
|
||
|
|
Highly interesting and fun | 79 (33.9) | 29 (36.7) | 29 (38.2) | 21 (26.9) |
|
||
| Relevance of intervention | .59 | |||||||
|
|
Strongly disagree | 7 (3) | 1 (1.3) | 3 (3.9) | 3 (3.8) |
|
||
|
|
Disagree | 16 (6.9) | 3 (3.8) | 7 (9.2) | 6 (7.7) |
|
||
|
|
Neither agree nor disagree | 40 (17.2) | 14 (17.7) | 9 (11.8) | 17 (21.8) |
|
||
|
|
Agree | 97 (41.6) | 36 (45.6) | 33 (43.4) | 28 (35.9) |
|
||
|
|
Strongly agree | 73 (31.3) | 25 (31.6) | 24 (31.6) | 24 (30.8) |
|
||
| Satisfaction with intervention | .71 | |||||||
|
|
Very dissatisfied | 3 (1.3) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.3) | 2 (2.6) |
|
||
|
|
Dissatisfied | 8 (3.4) | 2 (2.5) | 3 (3.9) | 3 (3.8) |
|
||
|
|
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied | 19 (8.2) | 4 (5.1) | 7 (9.2) | 8 (10.3) |
|
||
|
|
Satisfied | 99 (42.5) | 36 (45.6) | 28 (36.8) | 35 (44.9) |
|
||
|
|
Very satisfied | 104 (44.6) | 37 (46.8) | 37 (48.7) | 30 (38.5) |
|
||
| Quality of intervention | .02 | |||||||
|
|
Poor | 5 (2.1) | 0 (0) | 3 (3.9) | 2 (2.6) |
|
||
|
|
Okay | 25 (10.7) | 4 (5.1) | 9 (11.8) | 12 (15.4) |
|
||
|
|
Good | 96 (41.2) | 42 (53.2) | 23 (30.3) | 31 (39.7) |
|
||
|
|
Excellent | 107 (45.9) | 33 (41.8) | 41 (53.9) | 33 (42.3) |
|
||
| Likelihood of recommending intervention | .13 | |||||||
|
|
I would not recommend it to anyone | 7 (3) | 1 (1.3) | 2 (2.6) | 4 (5.1) |
|
||
|
|
There are very few people I would recommend it to | 29 (12.4) | 5 (6.3) | 11 (14.5) | 13 (16.7) |
|
||
|
|
There are several people whom I would recommend it to | 65 (27.9) | 28 (35.4) | 17 (22.4) | 20 (25.6) |
|
||
|
|
There are many people I would recommend it to | 74 (31.8) | 20 (25.3) | 29 (38.2) | 25 (32.1) |
|
||
|
|
Definitely—I would recommend it to everyone | 58 (24.9) | 25 (31.6) | 17 (22.4) | 16 (20.5) |
|
||
| Ease of use of Unmind app and intervention | .96 | |||||||
|
|
No (limited instructions, confusing, and complicated) | 1 (0.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.3) |
|
||
|
|
Useable after a lot of time and effort | 1 (0.4) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.3) | 0 (0) |
|
||
|
|
Usable after some time and effort | 12 (5.2) | 4 (5.1) | 4 (5.3) | 4 (5.1) |
|
||
|
|
Easy to learn how to use | 75 (32.2) | 26 (32.9) | 22 (28.9) | 27 (34.6) |
|
||
|
|
Able to use app immediately | 144 (61.8) | 49 (62) | 49 (64.5) | 46 (59) |
|
||
| Negative effects during the intervention | .11 | |||||||
|
|
Yes | 2 (0.9) | 0 (0) | 2 (2.6) | 0 (0) |
|
||
|
|
No | 231 (99.1) | 79 (100) | 74 (97.4) | 78 (100) |
|
||
aFisher exact tests comparing ratings across study arms.
bCS: combatting stress.
cWW: working with worry.
dBR: building resilience.