Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Mar 15;15(3):e013526. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.121.013526

Table 3.

Hazard of ASCVD and Global CVD Associated with BAC Presence and Gradation.

Model 1 HR*
(95% CI)
P Model 2 HR
(95% CI)
p
Hard ASCVD (n=5,059; 155 events)
BAC Presence vs. Absence Model
 BAC > 0 mg vs. BAC = 0 mg 1.58 (1.13–2.20) 0.007 1.51 (1.08–2.11) 0.02
BAC Gradation Model
 Tertile 1 when BAC is present vs. BAC = 0 mg 1.80 (1.31–2.88) 0.01 1.74 (1.09–2.77) 0.02
 Tertile 2 when BAC is present vs. BAC = 0 mg 1.65 (1.03–2.66) 0.04 1.60 (0.99–2.58) 0.05
 Tertile 3 when BAC is present vs. BAC = 0 mg 1.27 (0.75–2.17) 0.37 1.24 (0.73–2.11) 0.42
Global CVD (n=5,035; 427 events)
BAC Presence vs. Absence Model
 BAC > 0 mg vs. BAC = 0 mg 1.28 (1.04–1.57) 0.02 1.23 (1.002–1.52) 0.048
BAC Gradation Model
 Tertile 1 when BAC is present vs. BAC = 0 mg 1.20 (0.87–1.65) 0.27 1.16 (0.84–1.60) 0.37
 Tertile 2 when BAC is present vs. BAC = 0 mg 1.41 (1.05–1.90) 0.02 1.38 (1.02–1.85) 0.03
 Tertile 3 when BAC is present vs. BAC = 0 mg 1.22 (0.90–1.67) 0.20 1.21 (0.89–1.65) 0.23
*

age, race, education level

+ glycemic status, smoking, LDL-C and hypertension

BAC: breast arterial calcification; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; CVD: cardiovascular disease; ASCVD: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; HR: hazard ratio.