Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 16;2014(7):CD009878. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009878.pub2

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Inhaled corticosteroids dose‐response effect.

Inhaled corticosteroids dose‐response effect
Patient or population: children with persistent asthma
 Settings: outpatients
 Intervention: lower‐dose inhaled corticosteroids
Control: higher‐dose ICS
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No. of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Control group (higher‐dose ICS) Intervention group (lower‐dose ICS)
Growth velocity over 12 months (cm/y) 
 (higher is better) Mean growth velocity was 5.74 cm/y (range, 5.6 to 5.88) Corresponding growth velocity on lower‐dose ICS was 0.2 cm/y higher: mean 5.94 cm/y (95% CI 5.76 to 6.13) MD 0.20 (0.02 to 0.39) 728
 (4 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊕
 high Skoner 2011 data analysed using LRS model were used
Change in height over 3 months (cm)
(higher is better)
Unadjusted mean change in height over 3 months was 1.34 cm (range, 0.9 to 1.8 cm) Corresponding unadjusted change in height on lower‐dose ICS was 0.15 cm lower: mean 1.19 cm (95% CI 1.06 to 1.32) MD ‐0.15 (‐0.28 to ‐0.02) 944
 (9 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 moderate1 Data analysis was unadjusted for confounders
Change in height over 12 months (cm) 
 (higher is better) Unadjusted mean change in height over a year was 4.56 cm (range, 3.6 to 5.73 cm) Corresponding unadjusted change in height on lower‐dose ICS was 0.25 cm higher; mean 4.81 cm (95% CI 4.52 to 5.1) MD 0.25 (‐0.04 to 0.54) 548
 (4 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 moderate1 Data analysis was unadjusted for confounders
Change in SD scores over 12 months (height)
(low change is better)
Unadjusted mean change in SD score was ‐0.18 (range, ‐0.01 to ‐0.27) Corresponding mean unadjusted change on lower‐dose ICS was 0.08 less; mean ‐0.10 (95% CI ‐0.21 to 0.02) MD 0.08 (‐0.03 to 0.20) 328
 (3 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 moderate1 Data analysis was unadjusted for confounders
Change in weight over 12 months (kg) 
 (higher is better) Mean change in weight was 3.4 kg Corresponding mean change in weight on lower‐dose ICS was 0.3 kg lower: mean 3.1 (95% CI 2.58 to 3.62) MD ‐0.30 (‐0.82 to 0.22) 408
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low2 Based on only 1 trial
Change in BMI over 12 months (kg/m2) 
 (higher is better) Mean change in BMI was 0.7 kg/m2 Corresponding mean change in BMI on lower‐dose ICS was 0.2 kg/m2 less: mean 0.5 (95% CI 0.21 to 0.79) MD ‐0.20 (‐0.49 to 0.09) 408
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low2 Based on only 1 trial
Change in skeletal maturation over 12 months (years)
(higher is better)
Mean change in skeletal maturation was 0.95 years Corresponding mean change in skeletal maturation on lower‐dose ICS was 0.18 years more; mean 1.13 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.29) MD 0.18 (0.02 to 0.34) 181
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low2 Based on only 1 trial
*The basis for the assumed risk was the weighted mean control group risk across studies. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: Confidence interval.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence.
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1Data analysis was unadjusted for confounders.

2Based on only 1 trial.