Gelfand 2006.
Methods | DESIGN: randomised, double‐blind, multi‐centre, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group clinical study. This comprises 2 identical trials | |
Participants | SYMPTOMATIC PARTICIPANTS RANDOMLY ASSIGNED: N = 511 INTERVENTION: ICS (ciclesonide 40 μg/d): 252 CONTROL: ICS (ciclesonide 80 μg/d): 259 WITHDRAWALS: reported AGE: mean (years) (range): INTERVENTION: ICS (ciclesonide 40 μg/d): 8.14 ± 0.14 (4‐11) CONTROL: ICS (ciclesonide 80 μg/d): 8.20 ± 0.13 (4‐11) GENDER: N (male %): INTERVENTION: ICS (ciclesonide 40 μg/d): 160 (63.5) CONTROL: ICS (ciclesonide 80 μg/d): 169 (65.3) ASTHMA SEVERITY: persistent asthma with all severity ASTHMA DURATION: mean (months) (range): INTERVENTION: ICS (ciclesonide 40 μg/d): 4.32 ± 0.18 (0.26‐11.26) CONTROL: ICS (ciclesonide 80 μg/d): 4.35 ± 0.17 (0.25‐11.10) MEAN (± SD) β2‐AGONIST USE (puffs/d): INTERVENTION: ICS (ciclesonide 40 μg/d): 1.60 CONTROL: ICS (ciclesonide 80 μg/d): 1.64 DOSE OF ICS AT STUDY ENTRY AND AT RUN‐IN: placebo ATOPY (% of participants): not reported ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
|
|
Interventions | PROTOCOL DURATION
DEVICE: HFA‐metered dose inhaler DOSE OF ICS
CRITERIA FOR WITHDRAWAL FROM STUDY: reported |
|
Outcomes | ANALYSIS: intention‐to‐treat analysis. All participants receiving 1 or more doses of study medication with 1 or more post‐baseline measurements of FEV1 and height were included in the analysis. Missing values for withdrawals were handled by the last value extended principle OUTCOMES: reported at 12 weeks. Outcomes were measured every 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks GROWTH MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUE: not reported PULMONARY FUNCTION TESTS
FUNCTIONAL STATUS
BIOMARKERS
ADVERSE EVENTS: reported WITHDRAWALS: reported |
|
Notes | PUBLICATION: full paper (2006) FUNDING: funded by Aventis Pharmaceuticals CONFIRMATION OF METHODOLOGY: not received |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information on sequence generation |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Blinding of participants and key study personnel ensured |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Blinding of participants and key study personnel ensured |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No missing outcome data |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Study protocol not available but published reports include all expected outcomes, including those that were prespecified: ”We report the results of a prespecified integrated analysis of the efficacy and safety data from 2 identical, double‐blinded, randomised, placebo‐controlled studies of ciclesonide (at doses of 40, 80, and 160 μg) administered once daily to children with persistent asthma” |
Other bias | Low risk | Study apparently free of other sources of bias |