Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 16;2014(7):CD009878. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009878.pub2

Shapiro 1998.

Methods DESIGN: randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, multi‐centre study
Participants SYMPTOMATIC PARTICIPANTS
RANDOMLY ASSIGNED: N = 202
ANALYSED: N = 74
INTERVENTION: ICS (budesonide 100 μg/d): 102
CONTROL: ICS (budesonide 200 μg/d): 100
WITHDRAWALS: reported
AGE: mean (range) years
INTERVENTION: ICS (budesonide 100 μg/d): 11.8 (6‐18)
CONTROL: ICS (budesonide 200 μg/d): 12.1 (6‐18)
GENDER: male N (%)
INTERVENTION: ICS (budesonide 100 μg/d): 76 (74.5)
CONTROL: ICS (budesonide 200 μg/d): 76 (76)
ASTHMA SEVERITY: moderate to severe persistent asthma
ASTHMA DURATION: duration of ICS‐dependent asthma: mean (range) years
INTERVENTION: ICS (budesonide 100 μg/d): 2.8 (0.5‐11)
CONTROL: ICS (budesonide 200 μg/d): 2.5 (0.5‐13)
MEAN (± SD) β2‐AGONIST USE (puffs/d):
INTERVENTION: ICS (budesonide 100 μg/d): 2.8
CONTROL: ICS (budesonide 200 μg/day): 3.1
DOSE OF ICS AT STUDY ENTRY AND AT RUN‐IN: Participants discontinued their previous ICS at randomisation
ATOPY (% of participants): not reported
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
  • Aged 6 to 18 years

  • Reversible airway obstruction at the screening visit, defined by a 15% increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 second after inhalation of 180 or 360 mg of the beta2‐agonist

  • FEV1 of 50% or greater, and 85% or less of predicted value

  • Ability to use a peak flow meter

  • Use of a minimum of 2 asthma medications every day during the previous 6 months, 1 of which must have been an ICS

  • Female patients of childbearing potential must have had a negative result on a serum pregnancy test


EXCLUSION CRITERIA
  • History of carcinoma, diabetes, significant chest infection or any other major disorder

Interventions PROTOCOL
DURATION
  • Run‐in = 2 weeks

  • Intervention = 12 weeks


DEVICE: dry powder inhaler
DOSE OF ICS
  • INTERVENTION: budesonide 100 μg/d

  • CONTROL: budesonide 200 μg/d


CRITERIA FOR WITHDRAWAL FROM STUDY: reported
Outcomes ANALYSIS: done by analysis of variance. Poportion of patients who discontinued enrolment in the study was compared between treatment groups by using the Cochran‐Mantel‐Haenszel statistic
OUTCOMES
GROWTH MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUE: not reported
PULMONARY FUNCTION TESTS
  • Mean change from baseline FEV1 (percentage of predicted value) throughout the treatment period (from baseline to week 12)

  • Mean change from baseline in morning PEFR by treatment week and as average value throughout 12‐week treatment period (weeks 0 to 12)


FUNCTIONAL STATUS
  • Daytime and nighttime asthma symptom scores


BIOMARKERS: before randomisation and after 12 weeks of treatment
  • Blood samples for cortisol measurements

  • Cosyntropin stimulation test


ADVERSE EVENTS: reported
WITHDRAWALS: reported
Notes PUBLICATION: full paper (1998)
FUNDING: supported by a grant from Astra, USA
CONFIRMATION OF METHODOLOGY: data received from Symbicort and Established Respiratory Brands, AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, Sweden
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information on sequence generation
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Blinding of participants and key study personnel ensured
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Blinding of participants and key study personnel ensured
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No missing outcome data
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Study protocol not available but published reports include all expected outcomes, including those that were prespecified
Other bias Low risk Study apparently free of other sources of bias