Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 16;2014(7):CD009878. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009878.pub2

Shapiro 1998 b.

Methods DESIGN: randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, multi‐centre study
Participants SYMPTOMATIC PARTICIPANTS
RANDOMLY ASSIGNED: N = 201
ANALYSED: N = 75
INTERVENTION: ICS (budesonide 100 μg/d): 102
CONTROL: ICS (budesonide 400 μg/d): 99
WITHDRAWALS: reported
AGE: mean (range) years
INTERVENTION: ICS (budesonide 100 μg/d): 11.8 (6‐18)
CONTROL: ICS (budesonide 400 μg/d): 11.8 (6‐18)
GENDER: male N (%)
INTERVENTION: ICS (budesonide 100 μg/d): 76 (74.5)
CONTROL: ICS (budesonide 400 μg/d): 85 (85.8)
ASTHMA SEVERITY: moderate to severe persistent asthma
ASTHMA DURATION: duration of ICS‐dependent asthma: mean (range) years
INTERVENTION: ICS (budesonide 100 μg/d): 2.8 (0.5‐11)
CONTROL: ICS (budesonide 400 μg/d): 2.4 (0.5‐13)
MEAN (± SD) β2‐AGONIST USE (puffs/d):
INTERVENTION: ICS (budesonide 100 μg/d): 2.8
CONTROL: ICS (budesonide 400 μg/d): 3.2
DOSE OF ICS AT STUDY ENTRY AND AT RUN‐IN: Participants discontinued their previous ICS at randomisation
ATOPY (% of participants): not reported
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
  • As above


EXCLUSION CRITERIA
  • As above

Interventions PROTOCOL
DURATION
  • Run‐in = 2 weeks

  • Intervention = 12 weeks


DEVICE: dry powder inhaler
DOSE OF ICS
  • INTERVENTION: budesonide 100 μg/d

  • CONTROL: budesonide 400 μg/d


CRITERIA FOR WITHDRAWAL FROM STUDY: reported
Outcomes As above
Notes As above
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information on sequence generation
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Blinding of participants and key study personnel ensured
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Blinding of participants and key study personnel ensured
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No missing outcome data
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Study protocol not available but published reports include all expected outcomes, including those that were prespecified
Other bias Low risk Study apparently free of other sources of bias