Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 16;2014(7):CD009878. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009878.pub2

Skoner 2011 b.

Methods DESIGN: a phase III, multi‐centre, randomised, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, double‐blind, long‐term safety study
Participants SYMPTOMATIC PARTICIPANTS
RANDOMLY ASSIGNED: N = 98
ANALYSED: N = 73
INTERVENTION: ICS (mometasone furoate 100 μg/d): 48
CONTROL: ICS (mometasone furoate 200 μg/d qd): 50
WITHDRAWALS: reported
AGE: mean (range) years
INTERVENTION: ICS (mometasone furoate 100 μg/d): 6.4 (4‐9)
CONTROL: ICS (mometasone furoate 200 μg/d qd): 6.6 (4‐9)
GENDER: male N (%)
INTERVENTION: ICS (mometasone furoate 100 μg/d): 34 (70.8)
CONTROL: ICS (mometasone furoate 200 μg/d qd): 33 (66)
ASTHMA SEVERITY: persistent asthma; severity not reported
ASTHMA DURATION: mean (range) years
INTERVENTION: ICS (mometasone furoate 100 μg/d): 3.8 (0.67‐8.0)
CONTROL: ICS (mometasone furoate 200 μg/d qd): 3.6 (0.42‐8.0)
MEAN (± SD) β2‐AGONIST USE (puffs/d): not reported
DOSE OF ICS AT STUDY ENTRY AND AT RUN‐IN: washout period of 3 months
ATOPY (% of participants): not reported
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
  • As above


EXCLUSION CRITERIA
  • As above

Interventions PROTOCOL
DURATION
  • Run‐in = 1 to 2 weeks

  • Intervention = 52 weeks


DEVICE: dry powder inhaler
DOSE OF ICS
  • INTERVENTION: mometasone furoate 100 μg/d qd

  • CONTROL: mometasone furoate 200 μg/d qd


CRITERIA FOR WITHDRAWAL FROM STUDY: reported
Outcomes As above
Notes As above
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information on sequence generation; randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to different comparison groups
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Blinding of participants and key study personnel ensured
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Blinding of participants and key study personnel ensured
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No missing outcome data.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Study protocol not available but published reports include all expected outcomes, including those that were prespecified
Other bias Low risk Study apparently free of other sources of bias