Teper 2004.
Methods | DESIGN: randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled clinical study. | |
Participants | SYMPTOMATIC PARTICIPANTS RANDOMLY ASSIGNED: N = 20 INTERVENTION: ICS (fluticasone 100 μg/d): 10 CONTROL: ICS (fluticasone 250 μg/d): 10 WITHDRAWALS: reported AGE: months ± SD: INTERVENTION: ICS at specific dose: 13.1 ± 5.2 CONTROL: ICS (fluticasone 250 μg/d): 14.2 ± 5.7 GENDER: N (male %): INTERVENTION: ICS (fluticasone 100 μg/d): 6 (60%) CONTROL: ICS (fluticasone 250 μg/d): 7 (70%) ASTHMA SEVERITY: recurrent wheezing ASTHMA DURATION (mean years ± SD): not reported MEAN (± SD) β2‐AGONIST USE (puffs/d): not reported DOSE OF ICS AT STUDY ENTRY AND AT RUN‐IN: not reported ATOPY (% of participants): not reported ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
|
|
Interventions | PROTOCOL DURATION
DEVICE: metered‐dose inhaler with aerochamber DOSE OF ICS
CRITERIA FOR WITHDRAWAL FROM STUDY: reported |
|
Outcomes | ANALYSIS: not reported OUTCOMES: reported at 24 weeks; change in height reported as standard deviation score GROWTH MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUE: Participant's recumbent length was determined by means of a calibrated stadiometer. Three consecutive measurements were taken to obtain the mean value. Height was expressed as standard deviation score (SDS) for chronological age, according to Tanner and Whitehouse PULMONARY FUNCTION TESTS: not reported FUNCTIONAL STATUS
BIOMARKERS
ADVERSE EVENTS: not reported WITHDRAWALS: reported |
|
Notes | PUBLICATION: full paper (2005) FUNDING: not reported CONFIRMATION OF METHODOLOGY: not received |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Using a computer random number generator: ”Each child was then provided with a numbered,blinded metered‐dose aerosol inhaler containing FP (50 or 125 μg per actuation) or placebo, depending on their study group” |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Sequentially numbered drug containers of identical appearance |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Blinding of participants and key study personnel ensured |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Blinding of participants and key study personnel ensured |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No missing outcome data |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Study protocol not available but published reports include all expected outcomes, including those that were prespecified |
Other bias | Low risk | Study apparently free of other sources of bias |