Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 16;2014(7):CD009878. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009878.pub2
Study Reason for exclusion
Agertoft 2004 Not a parallel‐group study
Antoniu 2003 No daily ICS in 1 of the intervention groups (control group)
Apold 1975 Not a randomised controlled trial
Asrilant 1975 Not a randomised controlled trial
Bateman 2008 Participants aged ≥ 18 years
Baxter‐Jones 1998 Other group did not evaluate an additional ICS dose using the same molecule
Berger 2005 Enrolled participants were children younger than 1 year of age
Bernstein 1999 Other group did not evaluate an additional ICS dose using the same molecule
Birkebaek 1995 Not a parallel‐group study
Breborowicz 2005 Not a randomised controlled trial
Brook 1998 Not a randomised controlled trial
Brown 1973 Not a randomised controlled trial
Chuchalin 2008 Participants aged ≥ 18 years
Dickson 1973 Not a randomised controlled trial
Ferguson 2002 Other group did not evaluate an additional ICS dose using the same molecule
Godfrey 1973 Not a randomised controlled trial
Godfrey 1974 Not a randomised controlled trial
Guarnaccia 1996 Not a randomised controlled trial
Guo 2002 Not a parallel‐group study
Gwynn 1977 Not a randomised controlled trial
Hansel 2006 Participants aged ≥ 18 years
Kaiser 2008 Other group did not evaluate an additional ICS dose using the same molecule
Karpel 2007 Co‐intervention was not equivalent between comparison groups and/or was not stable throughout the observation period
Kemp 2004 Participants aged ≥ 18 years
Lang 2013 No daily ICS in 1 of the intervention groups
Laursen 1986 Participants aged ≥ 18 years
Lipworth 1996 Not a parallel‐group study
Lovera 1975 Not a randomised controlled trial
McAllen 1974 Not a parallel‐group study
Neffen 2006 Duplicate study
Nelson 2000 Co‐intervention not equivalent between comparison groups and/or not stable throughout the observation period
Niu 1998 Treatment administered for < 12 weeks
Otsuki 2009 No daily ICS in 1 of the intervention groups (control group)
Pearlman 2005 Not a randomised controlled trial
Pedeersen 2003 Not a parallel‐group study
Pedersen 2002 Other group did not evaluate an additional ICS dose using the same molecule
Peroni 2005 Co‐intervention not equivalent between comparison groups and/or not stable throughout the observation period
Phipatanakul 2003 No daily ICS in 1 of the intervention groups (control group)
Pines 1973 Not a randomised controlled trial
Skoner 2000 No daily ICS in 1 of the intervention groups (control group)
Skoner 2006 Duplication of already published paper
Skoner 2010 Treatment administered for < 12 weeks
Szefler 2008 No daily ICS in 1 of the intervention groups (control group)
Thompson 1998 Treatment administered for < 12 weeks
Turpeinen 2008 No daily ICS in 1 of the intervention groups (control group)
Visser 2001 No daily ICS in 1 of the intervention groups (control group)
Visser 2001a Duplication of already published paper
Visser 2004 No daily ICS in 1 of the intervention groups (control group)
Wasserman 1996 Participants aged ≥ 18 years
Wasserman 1996 b Participants aged ≥ 18 years
Waugh 2002 Not a randomised controlled trial
Williams 2010 No daily ICS in 1 of the intervention groups (control group)
Wolthers 1995 Not a parallel‐group study
Xu 2005 No daily ICS in 1 of the intervention groups (control group)