Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 17;23:94. doi: 10.1186/s12859-022-04627-9

Table 2.

Interaction relationships between core TFs and non-core that appear in the top 25 TFs as ranked by DL × JTK

S. cerevisiae M. musculus A. thaliana
Gene Targeted Targets Gene Targeted Targets Gene Targeted Targets
ASG1 FHL1 NDD1 EGR1 ARNTL [15] ARNTL [16] EPR1 RVE4 PRR5
EDS1 FHL1 TOS4 KLF10 ARNTL [17] ARNTL [18] PIF4 CCA1 LHY
GAT1 ACE2 ACE2 NFIC HLF [19] PIL6 CCA1 LHY
MTH1 FHL1 STB1 ATF5 CLOCK [20] ARF11 CHE
RME1 ACE2 ASH1 ESR1 CLOCK [21] CO CCA1
RPI1 FHL1 NDD1 SREBF1 BHLHE40 [22] COL1 CHE
SIP4 FHL1 STB1 BHLHE41 [22] COL9 CHE
TEC1 SWI4 ASH1 MYBL2 CHE
WTM2 ACE2 STB1 CDF2 LHY
ASF1 SWI4 RVE1 PRR5
HST3 FKH1 RVE2 CCA1
HST4 MBP1
POG1 MCM1
RLF2 MBP1
RTT107 MCM1
SNF5 ACE2
TBF1 FHL1

*S. cerevisiae and A. thaliana interactions determined respectively by database searches of [13] and [14] and represent a range of direct and indirect evidence types, including the presence of binding motifs in regulatory regions and response to TF over-expression. M. musculus interactions determined by evidence gathered in the associated citation

M. musculus non-core TFs drawn from MA dataset only, while non-core S. cerevisiae and A. thaliana TFs were drawn from the unions of each pair of analyzed datasets