Harris 2013.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Randomised controlled trial | |
Participants | 514 infants ≥ 35 weeks' gestation, < 48 postnatal hours old and at risk for hypoglycaemia. Risk factors included mother with diabetes, small (birthweight < 10th centile, or < 2500 grams) or large (birthweight > 90th centile or > 4500 grams) size, preterm (35 or 36 weeks' gestation) birth and other reasons such as poor feeding. Of these, 237 became hypoglycaemic and were randomised (5 infants randomised in error). The majority of infants were not admitted to NICU. Setting: New Zealand Timing Trial: 1 December 2008 to 31 November 2010 Follow‐up at two years: 21 July 2010 to 30 January 2013 Follow‐up at 4.5 years: September 2011 to June 2015. |
|
Interventions | Infants who became hypoglycaemic (< 2.6 mmol/L) were encouraged to feed (determined by maternal choice) and were randomised to receive 40% oral dextrose gel (0.5 mL/kg) (n = 118) or placebo gel (n = 119) massaged into the buccal membrane. Blood glucose concentration was measured 30 minutes following gel treatment. Gel was repeated if hypoglycaemia persisted. A maximum of six doses of gel could be given within a 48‐hour period. |
|
Outcomes |
Primary outcomes
Secondary outcomes
|
|
Notes |
*Data received from study authors. Blood glucose measured using glucose oxidase method. Funding sources included Waikato Medical Research Foundation, Auckland Medical Research Foundation, the Maurice and Phyllis Paykel Trust, the Health Research Council of New Zealand and the Rebecca Roberts Scholarship. Disclosure: 3 of the authors of this review (PJW, DLH and JE Harding) were involved in the design and conduct of this study. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Used computer‐generated blocked randomisation, with variable block sizes. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Central allocation by computer which provided a randomisation number corresponding to a numbered treatment pack. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Dextrose and placebo gels were identical in appearance. Clinicians, families and study investigators were masked to treatment allocation until completion of data analysis. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Outcome assessors were masked to treatment allocation. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Performed an intention‐to‐treat analysis. Five infants were randomised in error and were excluded from the analysis, leaving 118 infants in the oral dextrose gel group and 119 infants in the placebo gel group. Of the 237 randomised, 78% were followed up and assessed at 4.5 years' corrected age (96/118 oral dextrose gel group and 89/119 in the placebo gel group). Children assessed at 4.5 years were more likely to be exposed to alcohol and smoking during pregnancy, be of Māori ethnicity, have a lower minimum interstitial blood glucose concentration and be admitted to NICU compared with children not assessed. Those assessed were also less likely to be a singleton and of an ethnicity other than Māori or New Zealand European. All other maternal and infant characteristics were similar in those who were and were not assessed at 4.5 years. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | The only outcome not listed a priori was acceptability of the intervention. Otherwise, all prespecified outcomes were reported. |
Other bias | Low risk | A slightly greater number of mothers in the group allocated to oral dextrose gel than to placebo gel intended to breastfeed (114 of 115 vs 109 of 115). Fewer boys were allocated to the oral dextrose gel group than to the placebo gel group (48 of 118 vs 65 of 119). Groups were otherwise balanced. |