Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb;16(2):16–23. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7425

Table 2.

Results from the targeted peer-reviewed questionnaire

Reviewer ratings (n=2)

Questions Lowest quality (1) (2) (3) (4) Highest quality (5)
 Rate the guideline development methods. 0 0 0 0 2
 Rate the guideline presentation. 0 0 0 2 0
 Rate the guideline recommendations. 0 0 0 2 0
 Rate the completeness of reporting. 0 0 0 0 2
 Does this document provide sufficient information to inform your decisions? If not, what areas are missing? 0 0 0 0 2
 Rate the overall quality of the guideline report. 0 0 0 1 1

Strongly disagree (1) (2) Neutral (3) (4) Strongly agree (5)

 I would make use of this guideline in my professional decisions. 0 0 0 1 1
 I would recommend this guideline for use in practice. 0 0 0 2 0