Table 2.

Confirmatory Factor Analysis for 1023 participants who completed the AEBQ; and compared to the original AEBQ paper

	Model 1 (eight-factors)	Model 2 (seven-factors without Hunger)	Original AEBQ (eight-factors)	References*
RMSEA 90% CI	0.058 (0.056–0.061)	0.063 (0.060–0.066)	0.058 (0.056-0.061)	< 0.06
CFI	0.864	0.868	0.896	> 0.90
NFI	0.832	0.842	0.870	> 0.90
AIC	2580.770	2118.586	2613.345**	Smaller values, where the magnitude changes by at least 2 points***
BIC	3063.958	2512.956	3055.665**

RMSEA root mean square error of approximation, CFI comparative fit index, NFI normed fit index, AIC Akaike’s Information Criteria, BIC Bayesian Information Criterion

*Hu and Bentler 1999 [46]; Dugard et al. 2010 [41]

**These AIC and BIC values cannot be used to compare against the AIC and BIC values from analyses in the original AEBQ paper with the values for the analyses on the AEBQ-Esp; they can only be used to test nested models within the same sample (e.g., Model 1 and Model 2 for the AEBQ-Esp)

***Burnham and Anderson 2003 [43]