Skip to main content
. 2021 May 8;27(2):651–663. doi: 10.1007/s40519-021-01201-9

Table 4.

Pearson’s correlations and multivariable regression analyses between the eight AEBQ-Esp subscales (n = 998) and unadjusted and adjusted correlations with BMI in a Mexican sample

H FR EOE EF SR EUE FF SE BMI
Un-adjusted (r) Un-adjusteda (β)&
95% CI
Adjusteda (β)&
95% CI
Food approach subscales
 Hunger 1 0.56** 0.45** 0.27** 0.06 0.19** 0.02 − 0.02 − 0.06 − 0.42 (− 0.85, 0.00) − 0.09 (− 0.47,0.29)
 Food Responsiveness 1 0.48** 0.40** − 0.13** 0.11** − 0.05 − 0.10** − 0.04 − 0.30 (− 0.72, 0.13) 0.09 (− 0.29, 0.49)
 Emotional Over-Eating 1 0.12** 0.03 0.01 0.09** − 0.11** 0.14** 0.84** (0.47, 1.21) 0.94** (0.62, 1.27)
 Enjoyment of Food 1 − 0.28** − 0.02 − 0.28** − 0.06 − 0.10** − 0.69** (− 1.13, − 0.25) − 0.06 (− 0.46, 0.34)
Food Avoidance Subscales
 Satiety Responsiveness 1 0.31** 0.18** 0.32** − 0.11** − 0.80** (− 1.24, − 0.35) − 0.61** (− 1.01, − 0.21)
 Emotional Under-Eating 1 0.09** 0.09** − 0.10** − 0.60** (− 0.97, − 0.24) − 0.29 (− 0.61, − 0.04)
 Food Fussiness 1 0.01 0.09** 0.65** (0.20, 1.01) 0.07 (− 0.34, 0.47)
 Slowness in Eating 1 − 0.15** − 0.84** (− 1.19, − 0.49) − 0.70** (− 1.01, − 0.39)

CI confidence intervals

aAdjusted for age, sex, sample, education, marital and employment status

*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)

**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)

&β (beta) values are unstandarised