Table 4.
Estimate | P-value | 95% CI | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | |||
150 cm, n = 39 | ||||
Bariatric surgeon 1 | − 12 | 0.04 | − 24 | − 0.4 |
Bariatric surgeon 2 | 51 | 0.19 | − 3 | 14 |
Bariatric surgeon 3 | 41 | 0.31 | − 5 | 13 |
Bariatric surgeon 4 | 51 | 0.045 | 0.1 | 10 |
180 cm, n = 40 | ||||
Bariatric surgeon 1 | − 20 | 0.001 | − 29 | − 10 |
Bariatric surgeon 2 | 141 | 0.03 | 2 | 25 |
Bariatric surgeon 3 | − 712 | 0.13 | − 16 | 2 |
Bariatric surgeon 4 | − 512 | 0.23 | − 13 | 4 |
210 cm, n = 40 | ||||
Bariatric surgeon 1 | − 16 | 0.007 | − 26 | − 6 |
Bariatric surgeon 2 | 61 | 0.24 | − 5 | 17 |
Bariatric surgeon 3 | − 0.21 | 0.97 | − 8 | 8 |
Bariatric surgeon 4 | 51 | 0.18 | − 3 | 13 |
Dependent variable: percentage deviation (%). Estimates of repeated measures analyses were determined for each bariatric surgeon individually. CI, confidence interval
1Significant difference compared to bariatric surgeon 1
2Significant difference compared to bariatric surgeon 2