Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 18;8:28. doi: 10.1038/s41531-022-00287-x

Table 5.

Relative relationship of ePI to PIGD phenotype.

Source F Pr > F SOURCE F Pr > F
AGE 8.282 0.005 ePIRS 15.999 <0.00001
UPDRS I 0.753 0.388 AGE 5.354 0.023
UPDRS II 2.040 0.158 Sex 0.000 0.998
UPDRS III 3.059 0.085
Gender 0.177 0.675

(adjusted)

Explained variance

0.199

(adjusted) Explained

variance

0.274**

While age is superior to the UPDRS in predicting progression, the baseline ePIRS score is superior to age in the de-novo validation set (N = 79).

**p = 0.015.