Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 19;43(2):191–208. doi: 10.1007/s10935-022-00675-2

Table 2.

Model fit statistics by gender for Latent Class Analysis models with two to six latent classes (both cohorts)

Model − LL SCF χ2 LRT (p value) Stdres (%) LMR- LRT (p value) BLRT CAIC ssBIC BF cmP SSS Entropy
Women
Two-class − 18,486.365 1.30 15,478.245 (p > .001) 19.71 7284.164 (p < 0.001)  < 0.001 37,014.731 37,149.763 0.00 0.000 615 0.944
Three-class − 16,114.820 1.05 4212.802 (p > .001) 20.19 4692.487 (p < 0.001)  < 0.001 32,293.640 32,499.404 0.00 0.000 498 0.986
Four-class − 15,536.334 1.03 1947.927 (p > .001) 9.62 1144.629 (p < 0.001)  < 0.001 31,158.668 31,435.162 0.00 0.000 437 0.887
Five-class − 15,441.485 1.07 1723.971 (p > .001) 7.21 187.674 (p < 0.001)  < 0.001 30,990.970 31,338.196 0.00 0.000 138 0.884
Six-class − 15,358.161 1.10 1527.773 (p > .001) 2.88 164.869 (p < 0.05)  < 0.001 30,846.323 31,264.280 Na 1.000 129 0.862
Men
Two-class − 13,003.030 1.08 13,371.401 (p < 0.001) 24.87 7481.301 (p < 0.001)  < 0.001 26,048.061 26,174.903 0.00 0.000 657 0.971
Three-class − 11,815.458 1.02 3842.066 (p < 0.001) 20.30 2348.590 (p < 0.001)  < 0.001 23,694.915 23,888.199 0.00 0.000 305 0.991
Four-class − 11,433.833 1.03 1792.755 (p < 0.001) 10.15 754.716 (p < 0.001)  < 0.001 22,953.665 23,213.391 0.00 0.000 305 0.907
Five-class − 11,298.985 1.04 1550.583 (p < 0.001) 7.61 266.680 (p < 0.001)  < 0.001 22,705.970 23,032.137 0.00 0.000 289 0.905
Six-class − 11,183.159 1.04 1091.158 (p < 0.01) 3.05 164.869 (p < 0.05)  < 0.001 22,496.319 22,888.927 Na 1.000 288 0.851

LL log likelihood, SCF scaling correction factor of the robust maximum likelihood estimator, χ2 LRT likelihood ratio chi square goodness-of-fit; Stdres = standardized residuals, LMR-LRT Lo–Mendell–Rubin likelihood ratio test, BLRT bootstrapped likelihood ratio test, CAIC Consistent Akaike information criterion, ssBIC sample-size adjusted Bayesian information criterion, BF Bayesian factor, cmP approximate correct model probability, SSS smaller class numerosity