Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 18;32(3):033123. doi: 10.1063/5.0085291

FIG. 7.

FIG. 7.

Automaticity regimes in heterogeneous cell pairs with ephaptic and gap junction coupling. (a) Gap junction coupling strength ggap has negligible influence on the regimes for which automaticity occurs. Black dotted lines are the reference point for the Hopf bifurcation (HB) for the minimal fK1 for automaticity for identical cells and ggap=0 (cleft volume vcl=0.38μm3). Note that the asterisk in the left region of “both quiescent” indicates that for ggap=0 and small fK1(2), cell-1 triggers APs and cell-2 has sub-threshold oscillations [recall Fig. 6(c)]. However, this only occurs when ggap=0; for ggap>0, both cells are quiescent in that region. (b) Similar plot as (a) for various cleft volumes vcl—the boundary for automaticity shifts but varying ggap does not significantly change regimes for automaticity. The black dotted lines denoting the HB point are shorter to avoid clutter. (c) Detailed two-parameter bifurcation diagrams, fixing cell-1’s fK1 ( fK1(1)), with cleft volume on the vertical axis and cell-2’s fK1 ( fK1(2)) on horizontal. As in (a) and (b), gap junction coupling does not alter the boundary for which both cells are triggering APs. The near vertical line for ggap=0 (blue dotted) for small fK1(2) is indicative of the dynamics described in Fig. 6(c). (d) The blue curves (no gap junction) in (c) are shown on a single axis, related to Fig. 3(f) (black).