Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 12;2022:8401528. doi: 10.1155/2022/8401528

Table 3.

Comparison of MBB in cost, strength, density, recyclability, and manufacturing method with the conventional construction materials.

Material property Mycelium-based materials Polymer materials Gypsum-based materials Cement material
Density (kg/m3) 110 ± 0.01 to 330 ± 0.05(i) 22 to 30(i,b) 417–945(c) 1800–1950(d)
Cost ($/kg) 0.07–0.17(h) 2.1–2.3(h) 1.4–11(h)
Cost ($/m3) 19.05(e) 942.86(i)
Compressive strength (kPa) 360 ± 5 to 520 ± 8(m) 69–400(l) 60–550(c) 3450(k)
Water absorption (%) 200(b) 6.9(a) 52(f) 12(k)
Recyclability Fully degradable(h) Decades, century(h) Years, decades(h) None(g)
Raw materials Mycelium and organic wastes or substrates(i) Polymers and natural gases(a) Adhesives, sawdust, and chips(j) Cement and sand(k)
Manufacturing process Molding and growing(i) Polymerization and expansion(h) Lathing, pressing, resin infusion, and milling(h) Mixing, molding, and curing(k)

a[32], b[85], c[86], d[49], e[87], f[7], g[13], h[4], i[88], j[89], k[47], and l[69].