Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 20.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018 Apr 21;24(11):2324–2336. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.04.021

Table 1.

Characteristics of Enrolled Studies and Meta-Analyzed Studies

Characteristics Group 1: HHV-6 Reactivation Analyzed as a Risk Factor for aGVHD Group 2: aGVHD Analyzed as a Risk Factor for HHV-6 Reactivation Group 3: No Temporal Specification for HHV-6 vs. aGVHD Analysis

Whole* Meta-analysis* Whole* Meta-analysis*, Whole* Meta-analysis*
Total studies 14 11 1 N/A 18 12
Median patients in cohort (range) 103 (49–315) 108 (68–315) 44 N/A 48.5(15–366) 64.5 (23–366)
Prospective cohort 10(71.4) 7 (63.6) 1 (100) N/A 12(66.7) 9 (75)
Retrospective cohort 4 (28.6) 4 (36.4) 0 N/A 4(22.2) 2(16.7)
Case control 0 0 0 N/A 2(11.1) 1 (8.3)
Studies that administered HHV-6 antiviral prophylaxis (ganciclovir, foscarnet, or cidofovir) 3*(21.4) 3 (27.3) 1§(100) N/A 0 0
Studies that found a significant association between HHV-6 and aGVHD (P < .05) 10(71.4) 8 (72.7) 0 N/A 8 (44.4) 6 (50)
Median year of publication (range) 2013(1997–2017) 2014(2005–2017) 2015 N/A 2006(1995–2016) 2008(1999–2016)
Total patients 1773 1605 44 N/A 1553 1303
Patients who reactivated HHV-6 784 (44.2) 702 (43.7) 29 (65.9) N/A 668(43.1) 555 (42.6)
Median reactivation, % (range) 47.7 (16.7–93.6) 47(16.7–93.6) 65.9 N/A 56(13.9–87) 58(13.9–87)
Total CBT patients 521 (29.4) 491 (30.6) 44(100) N/A 307(19.8) 306 (23.5)
Median CBT, % (range) 21 (0–100) 20.1 (.9–100) 100 N/A 1.1 (0–100) 23.4(0–100)
Type of PCR used to diagnose HHV-6 reactivation
qPCR 13 (92.9) 11 (100) 1 (100) N/A 11 (61.1) 8 (66.7)
Qualitative PCR 0 0 0 N/A 2(11.1) 2 (16.7)
Nested PCR 1 (7.1) 0 0 N/A 5 (27.8) 2 (16.7)
Sample used for PCR
Plasma 12(85.7) 10(90.9) 1 (100) N/A 7 (38.9) 5(41.7)
Whole blood 0 0 0 N/A 5 (27.8) 4(33.3)
PBMCs/PBLs 1 (7.1) 1 (9.1) 0 N/A 5 (27.8) 2 (16.7)
Plasma + PBMC/PBLs 1 (7.1) 0 0 N/A 1 (5.6) 1 (8.3)

Values are n (%) unless otherwise defined. N/A indicates not applicable as meta-analysis was not performed for this group; PBLS, peripheral blood leukocytes.

*

“Whole” and “meta-analysis” indicate all enrolled studies and studies providing sufficient data to perform meta-analysis, respectively.

Meta-analysis for group 2 was not performed because of an insufficient number of studies.

Two studies [11,12] administered HHV-6 prophylaxis before HCT, and 1 study [13] administered HHV-6 prophylaxis until day+100 after HCT.

§

Ganciclovir was administered during conditioning followed by valacyclovir for first 100 days after HCT.