Table 4. Top ten barley accessions with phenotypic stability in all environments and their sAUPDS indexes.
| Ranking | Variety | D value | Yangzhou | Yancheng | Average | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2016 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | ||||
| 1 | Qimendamai | 0.0131 | 0.95 | 1.41 | 1.13 | 1.40 | 1.60 | 1.30 |
| 2 | Yangnongpi 7 | 0.0195 | 0.06 | 0.31 | 0.00 | 0.34 | 0.40 | 0.22 |
| 3 | Yangnongpi 8 | 0.0248 | 0.19 | 0.36 | 0.13 | 0.60 | 0.47 | 0.31 |
| 4 | Zhe 35-21 | 0.0248 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.16 |
| 5 | Yanyin 1 | 0.0265 | 0.49 | 1.27 | 0.87 | 1.68 | 1.20 | 0.99 |
| 6 | Yang 95168 × Yan 94130 | 0.0411 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.24 | 0.20 | 0.10 |
| 7 | Changmangluodamai | 0.0416 | 1.16 | 1.49 | 1.34 | 1.42 | 1.67 | 1.42 |
| 8 | Liudanzhun | 0.0427 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.31 | 0.33 | 0.09 |
| 9 | Yan 99175 | 0.0491 | 0.08 | 0.22 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.47 | 0.19 |
| 10 | Sunong 16 | 0.0492 | 0.16 | 0.49 | 0.00 | 0.53 | 0.47 | 0.33 |