Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 3;21(1):203–210. doi: 10.1007/s12663-020-01386-z

Table 2.

Contingency tables presenting net (and %) distributions of canal presence and its diameters across the genders, evaluated in the premolar and molar areas, as well as the results of the χ2 test comparing the sexes in terms of existence of detected canal and its diameter (α = 0.0125)

Area Sex Canal presence P Categorized canal diameter P
No Yes Total < 1 mm 1–2 mm > 2 mm Total
First premolar Male 76 (19) 89 (22.3) 165 (41.3) 0.1209 40 (17.1) 49 (20.9) 0 89 (38) 0.0533
Female 90 (22.5) 145 (36.3) 235 (58.8) 84 (35.9) 61 (26.1) 0 145 (62)
Total 166 (41.5) 234 (58.5) 400 (100) 124 (53) 110 (47) 0 234 (100)
Second premolar Male 25 (6.3) 138 (34.7) 163 (41) 0.0385 75 (23.7) 63 (19.9) 0 138 (43.5) 0.0023
Female 56 (14.1) 179 (45) 235 (59) 127 (40.1) 52 (16.4) 0 179 (56.5)
Total 81 (20.4) 317 (79.6) 398 (100) 202 (63.7) 115 (36.3) 0 317 (100)
First molar Male 34 (8.5) 131 (32.8) 165 (41.3) 0.0034 76 (26.6) 54 (18.9) 1 (0.3) 131 (45.8) 0.0015
Female 80 (20) 155 (38.8) 235 (58.8) 120 (42) 35 (12.2) 0 155 (54.2)
Total 114 (28.5) 286 (71.5) 400 (100) 196 (68.5) 89 (31.1) 1 (0.3) 286 (100)
Second molar Male 21 (5.3) 144 (36) 165 (41.3) 0.0566 102 (30.7) 40 (12) 2 (0.6) 144 (43.4) 0.0010
Female 47 (11.8) 188 (47) 235 (58.8) 164 (49.4) 23 (6.9) 1 (0.3) 188 (56.6)
Total 68 (17) 332 (83) 400 (100) 266 (80.1) 63 (19) 3 (0.9) 332 (100)