Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 5;9(2):842–852. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13788

Table 2.

Linear regression analysis for association between LA parameters, clinical or other echocardiographic variables, and peak VO2 (mL/kg/min): P‐value, b coefficient (95% confidence interval)

LA reservoir strain, % LA contractile strain, % LA conduit strain, % LA volume index, mL/m2
Univariate <0.0001; 0.21 (0.14–0.28) <0.0001; 0.29 (0.16–0.44) <0.0001; 0.32 (0.18–0.46) 0.002; −0.05 (−0.08 to −0.02)
Model 1 <0.0001; 0.22 (0.12–0.31) 0.001; 0.33 (0.15–0.52) <0.0001; 0.35 (0.17–0.53) 0.1; −0.03 (−0.09 to 0.01)
Model 2 <0.0001; 0.16 (0.08–0.24) 0.003; 0.23 (0.08–0.37) 0.007; 0.20 (0.06–0.35) 0.06; −0.03 (−0.06 to 0.001)

LA, left atrial; VO2, oxygen consumption.

Model 1: adjusted for age, body mass index, New York Heart Association class, atrial fibrillation/sinus rhythm, haemoglobin, and creatinine. Model 2: adjusted for left ventricular ejection fraction and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion.