Table 1.
Comparison of different methods for the isolation of exosomes.
| Methods | UF | UC | DGC | SiO2-pep affinity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Processing time (h) | 1 | 15 | 32 | 2 |
| Yield (μg protein in exosome samples per microliter of serum) | 22.10 | 0.16 | 0.05 | 0.72 |
| Purity (grayscale ratio of CD9/GAPDH compared to DGC, %) | 28 | 87 | 100 | 64 |
| Reproducibility (SD of grayscale ratio of CD9/GAPDH) | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.05 |
| Main contaminants | Macromolecular contaminants, VLDL, CM, HDL, ALB, IgG | Macromolecular contaminants, VLDL, CM, IgG | Macromolecular contaminants, HDL | ALB, IgG, Complexes containing PS |
| Advantages | Simple, fast, does not rely on equipment [6] | High purity, High sample capacity [6] | High purity [6] | Simple, fast, cheap, high yield, relatively high purity, single contamination, can preserve vesicular structure |
| Disadvantages | Low purity, loss of exosomes during the process [6] | Cumbersome process, time consuming, requires expensive equipment, may destroy vesicular structure, low yield, not suitable for high-throughput analysis [6] | Cumbersome process, time consuming, requires expensive equipment, may destroy vesicular structure, low yield, not suitable for high-throughput analysis [6] | Purity needs further improvement, low sample capacity |