Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 21;15:343–354. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.12.017

Table 1.

Comparison of different methods for the isolation of exosomes.

Methods UF UC DGC SiO2-pep affinity
Processing time (h) 1 15 32 2
Yield (μg protein in exosome samples per microliter of serum) 22.10 0.16 0.05 0.72
Purity (grayscale ratio of CD9/GAPDH compared to DGC, %) 28 87 100 64
Reproducibility (SD of grayscale ratio of CD9/GAPDH) 0.04 0.09 0.10 0.05
Main contaminants Macromolecular contaminants, VLDL, CM, HDL, ALB, IgG Macromolecular contaminants, VLDL, CM, IgG Macromolecular contaminants, HDL ALB, IgG, Complexes containing PS
Advantages Simple, fast, does not rely on equipment [6] High purity, High sample capacity [6] High purity [6] Simple, fast, cheap, high yield, relatively high purity, single contamination, can preserve vesicular structure
Disadvantages Low purity, loss of exosomes during the process [6] Cumbersome process, time consuming, requires expensive equipment, may destroy vesicular structure, low yield, not suitable for high-throughput analysis [6] Cumbersome process, time consuming, requires expensive equipment, may destroy vesicular structure, low yield, not suitable for high-throughput analysis [6] Purity needs further improvement, low sample capacity