Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 7;9(1):163–174. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00004

Table 3.

Specific indirect effects for indirect pathways based on bias-corrected bootstrapped estimates (Specific smartphone use time as mediators)

Specific indirect pathways tested Bootstrapped estimates for indirect effects
b SE 95% CI β
Instrumental motivation → PSU
 MPUT-Learning −0.074 0.014 [−0.103, −0.049] −0.031
 MPUT-Entertainment −0.024 0.006 [−0.039, −0.014] −0.010
 MPUT-Communication −0.010 0.005 [−0.022, −0.003] −0.004
Self-expression motivation → PSU
 MPUT-Learning −0.138 0.025 [−0.189, −0.093] −0.048
 MPUT-Entertainment 0.024 0.012 [0.004, 0.050] 0.008
 MPUT-Communication −0.002 0.008 [−0.018, 0.013] −0.001
Hedonic motivation → PSU
 MPUT-learning −0.003 0.050 [−0.113, 0.092] −0.001
 MPUT-Entertainment 0.107 0.028 [0.059, 0.169] 0.028
 MPUT-Communication 0.063 0.022 [0.029, 0.116] 0.016
Social relationship motivation → PSU
 MPUT-learning −0.005 0.035 [−0.070, 0.067] −0.002
 MPUT-Entertainment −0.020 0.017 [−0.057, 0.012] −0.006
 MPUT-Communication −0.004 0.013 [−0.029, 0.023] −0.001

Note: Bolded indirect pathways were significant based on bias-corrected bootstrapped 95% confidence interval (CI). PSU, problematic smartphone use; MPUTL, smartphone use time for learning; MPUTE, smartphone use time for entertainment; MPUTC, smartphone use time for communication; b, unstandardized coefficient; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval for the unstandardized coefficient; β, standardized coefficient.