Abstract
Objectives
Epileptic patients suffer from seizure recurrence after surgery due to the challenging localization. Improvement of the noninvasive imaging‐based approach for a better definition of the abnormalities would be helpful for a better outcome.
Methods
The quantitative anisotropy (QA) of diffusion spectrum imaging (DSI) is a quantitative scalar of evaluating the water diffusivity. Herein, we investigated the association between neuronal diameters or density acquired in literature and QA of DSI as well as the seizure localization in temporal lobe epilepsy. Thirty healthy controls (HCs) and 30 patients with hippocampal sclerosis (HS) were retrospectively analyzed. QA values were calculated and interactively compared between the areas with different neuronal diameter/density acquired from literature in the HCP‐1021 template. Diagnostic tests were performed on Z‐transformed asymmetry indices (AIs) of QA (which exclude physical asymmetry) among HS patients to evaluate its clinical value.
Results
The QA values in HCs conformed with different pyramidal cell distributions ranged from giant to small; corresponding groups were the motor‐sensory, associative, and limbic groups, respectively. Additionally, the QA value was correlated with the neuronal diameter/density in cortical layer IIIc (correlation coefficient with diameter: 0.529, p = 0.035; density: −0.678, p = 0.011). Decreases in cingulum hippocampal segments (Chs) were consistently observed on the sclerosed side in patients. The area under the curve of the Z‐transformed AI in Chs to the lateralization of HS was 0.957 (sensitivity: 0.909, specificity: 0.895).
Interpretation
QA based on DSI is likely to be useful to provide information to reflect the neuronal diameter/density and further facilitate localization of epileptic tissues.
1. Introduction
Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders worldwide. 1 , 2 Although epilepsy causes aberrant electrical discharges, it is molecularly associated with abnormal local gamma‐aminobutyric acid/glutamatergic neuronal activity. 3 Malfunction of microscale networks, such as neuron‐glia interaction networks, 4 plays a vital role in the process of seizure priming 3 ; however, these microscale gray matter abnormalities are often challenging to detect in humans. Localizing the epileptogenic focus is challenging during presurgical evaluation; even experts at best achieve 50% accuracy if only routine magnetic resonance images (MRI) are used as references. 5 Thus, approaches that can evaluate the gray matter components are needed.
Diffusion tensor imaging can evaluate water molecule diffusion anisotropy in the living brain and has been used to evaluate epileptic connectomes. 6 It has also been introduced to investigate microanatomic properties in epileptic disease 7 ; The human neocortex comprises six laminae, 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 with pyramidal, granule, and fusiform cells distributed among these layers; specifically, layer III and layer V were named as external and internal pyramidal layers. 12 , 13 , 14 Laminar components differ between subregions; in particular, the majority of white matter comprises pyramidal cell (PC) axons. Giant PCs, primarily distributed among the Rolandic areas and visual and acoustic cortices, are neurons that typically conduct faster, project over longer distances, and are involved with primary function. Smaller PCs, mainly located in the frontal lobe and temporo‐parieto‐occipital areas, conduct slower and primarily deal with higher brain functions. Hippocampal PCs have also been comprehensively explored; notably, their neuronal diameter is greater on the left side. 15 PCs account for 75% and 80% of the total gray matter neurons and white matter is mainly composed of PC axons 16 ; hence, determining the components or abnormalities of the gray matter by quantifying the properties of white matter may be feasible. This might be of clinical value, especially for diseases such as hippocampal sclerosis (HS), which includes PC losses. 17
However, DTI only assesses the average fiber orientation in a voxel. Diffusion spectrum imaging (DSI) is a recently developed approach that acquires enormous white matter diffusion directions within a voxel. Quantitative anisotropy (QA) derived from DSI can quantify complex distributions of intravoxel directions; therefore, DSI may be valuable in the assessment of tissue properties. 18 Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most common type of epilepsy. TLE 30%–40% of the patients are MRI negative, while approximately 15%–20% of the patients still have residual seizures. 19 Therefore, identifying the tissue properties of TLE for a better localization might be of great value for clinical practice. In our previous study of small sample data, we got a preliminary impression that temporal local QA is beneficial for seizure localization. 20 In this study, we first evaluated the accuracy of the DSI QA revealing the tissue properties with comparison to cellular data from previous studies, 12 , 21 then we quantified the efficiency of the DSI QA in lateralizing the epileptogenesis in patients with TLE.
2. Materials and Methods
This retrospective study included 30 healthy controls (HCs) and 30 mesial TLE patients with unilateral HS (19 left, 11 right) enrolled between October 2019 and January 2021 at our radiological department; detailed clinical data are shown in Table 1 and Table S1. The healthy volunteers were enrolled from the university campus and evaluated by two experienced radiologists and two neurologists to make sure that there were no neurological or mental disorders. Two experienced neuroradiologists evaluated the basic MRI images of the 30 patients with HS enrolled in this study. Specifically, 22 of these patients' basic MRIs showed reduced hippocampal volume and increased signal intensity on the ipsilateral side with T2 FLAIR images, while the other eight patients were MRI negative and hard to diagnose using only basic MRI. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, and the institution’s ethical committee approved the study.
Table 1.
Variable | HS (n = 30) | HC (n = 30) | p‐value |
---|---|---|---|
Sex (M/F) | 16/14 | 13/17 | 0.438 |
Age (y) | 29.6 (14–53) | 24.6 (19–33) | 0.054 |
Age at epilepsy onset (y) | 16.6 (1–38) | — | — |
Epilepsy duration (y) | 12.9 (1–30) | — | — |
Monthly seizure frequency (times/month) | >15, n = 5; 6–15, n = 5; 3–5, n = 5; 1–3, n = 15 | — | — |
HS laterality | Left, n = 19; Right, n = 11 | — | — |
Abbreviations: HC, healthy controls; HS, hippocampal sclerosis.
Quantitative continuous variables: Mean, with range in parentheses.
To observe the differences in extracted QA values across groups with different pyramidal diameters and functions, we first classified the subcortical regions of the JHU White Matter Labels (1 mm) atlas in local HCs into groups of motor/sensory, associative, and limbic fibers. The neuronal diameter/density information in literature 12 , 21 and QA of different regions in the HCP‐1021 template (https://pitt.box.com/v/HCP1021‐1mm) were analyzed to investigate the association in normal brain tissues.
Patients with HS were enrolled, and the epileptogenic foci of these patients was localized via pathological findings or seizure freedom after treatment. The QA scalars of the hippocampus were quantified using comprehensive statistics to evaluate the global QA changes in HS patients, and further forecast value to the HS lateralization was observed. The flow diagram of the procedure is shown in Figure 1.
2.1. Image acquisition
DSI results were acquired using a SIGNA Premier 3.0 Tesla MRI scanner (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) with a 64‐channel phased‐array coil. The parameters were as follows: echo time (TE) = 84.2 msec, repetition time (TR) = 5589 msec, field of view = 224 mm × 224 mm, voxel size = 2 × 2 × 2 mm3, maximum b‐value = 7000 sec/mm2, total diffusion directions = 257, in‐plane resolution = 2 mm, and slice thickness = 2 mm. T1 anatomical reference images were acquired using high‐resolution T1‐weighted magnetization‐prepared rapid acquisition gradient‐echo sequences (TE = 2.69 msec, TR = 2477 msec, flip angle = 8°, isotropic 1.0‐mm voxels).
2.2. DSI data analysis
We first reconstructed the spin distribution function 18 in all individual spaces using DSI Studio software (http://dsi‐studio.labsolver.org). The diffusion data were reconstructed using generalized q‐sampling imaging 18 as previously described. 22
2.2.1. ROI‐based global quantification of QA values
Whole‐brain level QA values were extracted, and the JHU White Matter Labels (1 mm) atlas was used to parcel the global white matter into 48 ROIs. The mean QA value of each ROI was calculated using MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA). Then, we compared the individual QA values of different white matter ROIs in the HS patients with the HCs, to determine if the presence of white matters with low QA values outside the temporal lobe was related to worse seizure outcomes.
2.2.2. Functional criteria for ROI classification
ROIs containing motor, sensory, auditory, or visual fibers were parcellated into the motor/sensory (including fibers associated with primary and secondary cortices) group according to function, 23 and these contained giant PC fibers. 12 In contrast, the ROIs carrying fibers to the dorsal prefrontal cortices, new cortical regions of the anterior temporal lobe, and speech‐related fibers were classified into the associative group; these contained small PC fibers. The limbic group included all segments of the cingulum and fornix body (Table 2). 24
Table 2.
Groups | Fibers | Connections |
---|---|---|
MSG | Body of corpus callosum | Connecting bilateral Rolandic areas |
MSG | Cerebral peduncle | Containing M1 and M2 fibers |
MSG | Posterior limb of internal capsule | Containing motor and sensory fibers |
MSG | Optic radiation | Optic pathway |
MSG | Retrolenticular part of internal capsule | Carrying the optic radiation |
MSG | Splenium of corpus callosum | Connecting bilateral optic centrals |
MSG | Superior corona radiata | Carrying pyt fibers |
AG | Anterior corona radiata | Carrying fibers to anterior frontal lobe |
AG | Anterior limb of internal capsule | Carrying fibers to anterior frontal lobe |
AG | Genu of corpus callosum | Connecting bilateral anterior frontal lobe |
AG | Posterior corona radiata | Containing parietal fibers |
AG | Sagittal stratum | Containing inferior fronto‐occipital fasciculus fibers dealing with semantic processing |
AG | Superior longitudinal fasciculus | Associated with speaking, tool use, perspective taking, and empathy |
AG | Tapetum | The tapetum curves anteriorly into the temporal lobe, extending almost to the tip of the temporal horn just lateral to the tail of the caudate nucleus |
AG | Uncinate fasciculus | Connecting amygdala/medial temporal structures and medial prefrontal regions |
LG | cingulate segment of the cingulum | Connecting frontal, parietal, and occipital structures |
LG | hippocampal segment of the cingulum | Connecting mesial temporal structures |
LG | Body of the fornix | Containing fibers directly efferent from the hippocampus |
Abbreviations: AG, associative group; LG, limbic group; MSG, motor‐sensory group; PyT, pyramidal tract.
Descriptive statistical analyses were performed to determine the global QA value differences between the motor‐sensory, associative, and limbic groups and the hippocampus‐related fibers. The significance (p < 0.05) of these differences was determined using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 23; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).
2.3. Relationship between QA values and the Von Economo‐Koskinas atlas
We generated a QA map with the HCP‐1021 template to obtain an average QA distribution across a large population and labeled it with the Von Economo‐Koskinas atlas. The atlas contains detailed cell diameters and density of different layers concerning different brain subregions. 12 An MRI version of the atlas became available recently. 21 With FreeSurfer software (https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/DownloadAndInstall), we strictly defined the ROI of brain regions to the insertion of subcortical white matter to extract the mean QA value of different areas in the QA map of the HCP‐1021 average template, thereby facilitating a quantified analysis between the QA and cellular parameters. The average values of cell diameters and density (Tables S2 and S3) and the laminar thicknesses of layers I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IIIc, IV, Va, Vb, VIa, and VIb (these layers or sub‐layer have relatively articulate neuronal diameter/density records) were compared with the mean QA values by Spearman correlation analysis in a region‐by‐region manner.
2.4. Patients’ diagnostic test
Thirty patients with HS were enrolled to evaluate the QA in pathological brain tissues. We first plotted the violin plot of patients. Subsequently, we calculated the asymmetry index (AI) of QA value in ROIs and the mean and standard deviation in HCs. AI was defined as follows:
where L and R represents the fiber tract QA value on the left and right side, respectively. As the distribution of diffusion scalars among different tracts was reported to be asymmetrical in healthy people, 25 , 26 Z‐transformation was performed on the AIs of patients using the mean±standard deviation in the previous step. To determine the diagnostic value of these Z‐scores during HS lateralization, the AUC of each Z‐score was calculated to forecast the left and right sides.
2.5. Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.
3. Results
3.1. Patient population
Temporal semiologies, including abdominal aura, absence seizure, and automatism were observed in all 30 HS patients. All patients were lateralized, either via pathological results or seizure freedom after treatment (Table 1).
3.2. Quantified DSI scalar in healthy participants
First, the QA values from the local HC dataset were examined according to fiber group. The distribution of PCs with different axonal diameters is shown in Figure 2A. The mean QA value of different participants in the motor‐sensory group was highest (QA: 0.192), followed by the associative (QA: 0.156) and limbic (QA: 0.143) groups; these differences were significant (ANOVA: F = 27.514, p < 0.001; Bonferroni corrected required p‐value of 0.017: p < 0.001 within associative and motor‐sensory groups; p < 0.001 within limbic and motor‐sensory groups; p = 0.166 within associative and limbic groups; Fig. 2B).
When comparing the neuronal diameter/density of different layers in Von Economo‐Koskinas atlas to the average QA values of the corresponding labels in HCP‐1021 template, layer IIIc parameters (Tables S2 and S3) were found to have the highest and consistent positive r value of the cell size (Spearman correlation, r = 0.529, p = 0.035), whereas negative r of the cell density (r = −0.678, p = 0.011) with the QA values (Fig. 2C).
3.3. Quantified DSI scalar study in patients with HS
Compared with HCs, changes in QA values were observed in both left and right HS groups. Notably, lateralization was observed at the cingulum hippocampal segments (Chs), as there appeared to be an ipsilateral decrease in QA value at group level among the left or right HS patients. The mean QA value of Chs decreased on the left side (left HS: 0.132; HC: 0.148; p < 0.05) in 19 left HS patients. A decrease in the mean QA value of Chs on the right side (right HS: 0.128; HC: 0.144; p < 0.05) was observed in 11 right HS patients. Accordingly, selective loss of pyramidal neurons in HS patients were observed among the affected side of these patients in HE staining and NeuN immunohistochemistry. Additionally, nonselective decline of QA values was observed in the entire fornix (Fig. 3).
The QA distribution in HS patients was similar to that in HCs, specifically, the motor‐sensory group was prominently higher than associative and limbic groups (Fig. 3). Regarding the effect of HS on the global white matter bundles extra‐temporal lobe in patients, significant changes (p = 0.005) were only identified in the left associative group among patients with left HS, which were lower than the QA of the HCs. Whereas all other fiber groups (all the motor‐sensory groups and the other associative groups) were not in statistical significance relative to HCs. Combining the average QA value of the same white matter region across different HCs into a 1 by 48 vector indicating the centroid, the Euclidean distance of the QA values in right HS (0.1019) to the centroid was only 88.53% of the left HS (0.1151), indicating that left HS‐induced greater pathological change compared with right HS. Notably, in patients with unfavorable seizure outcomes (PT003, PT005, PT009, PT015, and PT024), the QA values of the extra‐temporal white matters decreased below this centroid obviously (Fig. 3E).
3.4. Clinical implications of QA values in HS patients: A diagnostic test
Based on the mean and standard of AI in HCs, Z‐transformation was performed on the AI of QA values in individual patients. In patients with left HS, a negative Z‐score (right‐side dominant in relative to the HCs) was observed at the Chs; conversely, in patients with right HS, a positive Z‐score (left‐side dominant in relative to the HCs) was observed. Z‐transformed AI of Chs between left and right HS patients was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Both left and right HS exhibited a negative Z‐score in the anterior limb of the internal capsule (Fig. 4A).
To evaluate the effect of the AI Z‐score when forecasting HS laterality, we plotted the ROC curve and calculated the AUC using the AI Z‐scores (zAI) of each white matter region. Age and zAI are uncorrelated (Pearson r = 0.18) and independent (P(age<31) = 50%, P(zAI<‐0.4) = 50%, and P(age < 31, zAI<‐0.4) = 8/30 = 27%). The HS affected side was the label to be predicted. The Chs possessed the most notable AUC value, which was 0.957. The best diagnostic performance occurred at Z‐transformed AI threshold of −0.027 (sensitivity: 0.909, specificity: 0.895), and the Chs exhibited the highest diagnostic value among the white matter fibers (Fig. 4B).
4. Discussion
In this study, we explored the value of QA in revealing the tissue properties, and further tested its accuracy in seizure localization. In healthy participants, we observed a negative correlation between QA value and density, and a positive correlation between QA value and cell diameter. Regarding patients with HS, PCs loss and chronic fibrillary gliosis were the typical pathological change, 27 and QA values were decreased. Subsequent prediction of HS using the Z‐transformed AIs of the QA showed an overall favorable accuracy in the diagnostic test.
QA values among the motor‐sensory, associative, and limbic groups were unequally distributed in the present study. In M1 and S1, where the distribution of giant PCs was reported, 12 the QA value was the highest. In areas of the associative group and limbic group with minor to moderate PCs, 12 the QA values were lower. The information (e.g., cell density and diameter) of PCs in the neocortex differ according to location. Von Economo 12 described the information in terms of density and diameters in a histological atlas. This atlas was recently digitalized into an MRI version, 21 which made the comparison of neuronal diameter/density with the QA values possible. In further analysis, the increase in cell diameters in layer IIIc was likely associated with an increase in QA values within the white matter at the subcortical boundary.
Projections of layer IIIc neurons mostly constitute the corpus callosum and the cortico‐thalamus fibers. 28 , 29 , 30 Thus, these projections mainly account for intra‐skull connections, while layer V projections tend to constitute motor, sensory, visual, or auditory fibers that exit the skull. 28 , 31 As we observed the white matter QA at the gray–white matter conjunction, the detection of intracranial projections might have been more feasible. Thus, we detected a closer association between the QA and layer IIIc in this study. These observations indicate that evaluating the PCs in the cortices via QA quantification might be justifiable.
Albeit not statistically significant, we observed higher QA values on the left Chs in HCs. Previous studies using diffusion tensor imaging frequently reported that the fractional anisotropy of cingulum tended to be higher on the left side of healthy participants. 32 , 33 , 34 Highley et al. reported similar findings: the sizes of cells in the left hippocampi of healthy brains tended to be larger, 15 although this cellular asymmetry was not statistically significant. We observed that patients with HS had a significant decrease in QA values at the Chs of the affected side. This might be closely related to the status of the PCs, as HS manifests as a selective loss of pyramidal neurons. 17 As aforementioned, the tracts’ QA values may differ between left and right in humans; thus, filtering the AI of HCs using Z‐transformation is more justified to evaluate the content of the PCs in epilepsy patients, and the AI Z‐scores of the Chs were observed to have a high AUC value to the lateralization of the sclerosed hippocampus. Previous studies have focused on lateralizing the HS with the diffusion scalars of hippocampal gray matter 35 , 36 instead of the Chs. Recent studies reported that FA of the Chs was a sensitive measure for mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer’s disease, and aging. 37 , 38 Using a diagnostic test, the present study indicated that QA values of the Chs could also be recognized as a sensitive measure for HS.
Based on the discussions above, we got an initial perception that QA is associated with the tissue properties of different subregions. For example, in a healthy brain where neurons are routinely densely packed, 12 QA would be higher in tissue with low neuronal density and large cell diameters. While in a pathological state that causes PC loss, these cells become loosely packed, and the QA would decrease (Fig. 2D).
Regarding QA changes besides the mesial temporal structures, according to quantitative analysis, the decline in QA of the left hemisphere associative group was found to be statistically significant in left HS patients; conversely, right HS did not cause evident changes to areas external to the mesial temporal lobe. As the associative group is typically involved with higher brain functions, these observations indicated that left HS is more likely to impact higher brain function than right HS. 39 , 40 Furthermore, according to previous literature of fMRI, the left HS would have a much dominant impact to higher brain functions, such as memory, and language. 41 , 42 , 43 This is in line with our observations. Besides, a vast decrease of the QA values mainly appeared in patients with unfavorable seizure outcomes, indicating that low QA values in areas outside the anterior temporal lobe may be a predictor of seizure recurrence.
Although the QA values were validated with tissue properties, limitations still exist, as the cellular data were from the literature instead of histological experiments. Moreover, the sample size of the series was limited. Only 11 cases of right HS were enrolled; thus, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed in the future. Furthermore, as the present study focused on the diffusion scalars, procedures involved with fiber tracking, such as U‐fiber quantification, would be investigated in future research. Additionally, the main objective of this study was to preliminarily describe the association between the QA and tissue properties, and further explore its clinical application in TLE patients; Thus, future studies are needed to quantify QA usage in patients with neocortical epilepsy.
In summary, based on the DSI data of 30 healthy participants and the HCP‐1021 template, we preliminarily found the QA values might be potential to reveal the tissue properties of different brain areas in HCs. Further, using a diagnostic test, we indicated that the QA value of the Chs could be a reliable measure for the lateralization of HS in patients with the epileptic disease. Future studies on the QA scalar might provide an in‐depth and noninvasive approaches to various seizures’ localizations.
Author Contributions
Zhen‐Ming Wang: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Writing ‐ original draft. Peng‐Hu Wei: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis. Miao Zhang: Methodology, Investigation (Radiologist). Chunxue Wu: Investigation (Radiologist). Yi Shan: Methodology. Fang‐Cheng Yeh: Supervision. Yongzhi Shan: Investigation (Neurosurgeon). Jie Lu: Conceptualization, Writing ‐ review & editing, Supervision. All coauthors have seen and agreed with the contents of the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
None.
Supporting information
Acknowledgement
This project was supported by Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals’ Ascent Plan (DFL20180802), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 81871009, 81801288, 82030037, 81790652), Huizhi Ascent Project of Xuanwu Hospital (HZ2021ZCLJ005), and Beijing Hospitals Authority Youth Program (QML20190805). Data were provided in part by the Human Connectome Project, WU‐Minn Consortium (Principal Investigators: David Van Essen and Kamil Ugurbil; 1U54MH091657) funded by the 16 NIH Institutes and Centers that support the NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research; and by the McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience at Washington University.
Funding informationThis project was supported by Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals’ Ascent Plan (DFL20180802), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 81871009, 81801288, 82030037, 81790652), Huizhi Ascent Project of Xuanwu Hospital (HZ2021ZCLJ005), and Beijing Hospitals Authority Youth Program (QML20190805). Data were provided in part by the Human Connectome Project, WU‐Minn Consortium (Principal Investigators: David Van Essen and Kamil Ugurbil; 1U54MH091657) funded by the 16 NIH Institutes and Centers that support the NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research; and by the McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience at Washington University.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by Beijing Hospitals Authority Youth Program grant QML20190805; Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals’ Ascent Plan grant DFL20180802; Huizhi Ascent Project of Xuanwu Hospital grant HZ2021ZCLJ005; National Natural Science Foundation of China grants 81790652, 81801288, 81871009, and 82030037.
References
- 1. Schmidt D, Sillanpää M. Evidence‐based review on the natural history of the epilepsies. Curr Opin Neurol. 2012;25(2):159‐163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Nicoletti A, Sofia V, Vitale G, et al. Natural history and mortality of chronic epilepsy in an untreated population of rural Bolivia: a follow‐up after 10 years. Epilepsia. 2009;50(10):2199‐2206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Pfisterer U, Petukhov V, Demharter S, et al. Identification of epilepsy‐associated neuronal subtypes and gene expression underlying epileptogenesis. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Patel DC, Tewari BP, Chaunsali L, Sontheimer H. Neuron‐glia interactions in the pathophysiology of epilepsy. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019;20(5):282‐297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Von Oertzen J, Urbach H, Jungbluth S, et al. Standard magnetic resonance imaging is inadequate for patients with refractory focal epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73(6):643‐647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Ji GJ, Zhang Z, Xu Q, Zang YF, Liao W, Lu G. Generalized tonic‐clonic seizures: aberrant interhemispheric functional and anatomical connectivity. Radiology. 2014;271(3):839‐847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Farquharson S, Tournier JD, Calamante F, et al. Periventricular nodular heterotopia: detection of abnormal microanatomic fiber structures with whole‐brain diffusion MR imaging tractography. Radiology. 2016;281(3):896‐906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Douglas RJ, Martin KA. Neuronal circuits of the neocortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:419‐451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Gilbert CD, Li W. Top‐down influences on visual processing. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14(5):350‐363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Reid RC, Alonso JM. The processing and encoding of information in the visual cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1996;6(4):475‐480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Senzai Y, Fernandez‐Ruiz A, Buzsáki G. Layer‐specific physiological features and interlaminar interactions in the primary visual cortex of the mouse. Neuron. 2019;101(3):500‐13.e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Von Economo C. Cellular structure of the human cerebral cortex. Karger Medical and Scientific Publishers; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kushchayev SV, Moskalenko VF, Wiener PC, et al. The discovery of the pyramidal neurons: Vladimir Betz and a new era of neuroscience. Brain. 2012;135(Pt 1):285‐300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Wagstyl K, Larocque S, Cucurull G, et al. BigBrain 3D atlas of cortical layers: cortical and laminar thickness gradients diverge in sensory and motor cortices. PLoS Biol. 2020;18(4):e3000678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Highley JR, Walker MA, McDonald B, Crow TJ, Esiri MM. Size of hippocampal pyramidal neurons in schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry. 2003;183:414‐417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Hevner RF. From radial glia to pyramidal‐projection neuron: transcription factor cascades in cerebral cortex development. Mol Neurobiol. 2006;33(1):33‐50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. DeGiorgio CM, Tomiyasu U, Gott PS, Treiman DM. Hippocampal pyramidal cell loss in human status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 1992;33(1):23‐27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Yeh FC, Wedeen VJ, Tseng WY. Generalized q‐sampling imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010;29(9):1626‐1635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Gok B, Jallo G, Hayeri R, Wahl R, Aygun N. The evaluation of FDG‐PET imaging for epileptogenic focus localization in patients with MRI positive and MRI negative temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuroradiology. 2013;55(5):541‐550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Wang YH, Wang ZM, Wei PH, et al. Lateralizing the affected side of hippocampal sclerosis with quantitative high angular resolution diffusion scalars: a preliminary approach validated by diffusion spectrum imaging. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(4):297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Scholtens LH, de Reus MA, de Lange SC, Schmidt R, van den Heuvel MP. An MRI Von Economo ‐ Koskinas atlas. Neuroimage. 2018;15(170):249‐256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Wang ZM, Wei PH, Shan Y, et al. Identifying and characterizing projections from the subthalamic nucleus to the cerebellum in humans. Neuroimage. 2020;15(210):116573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Mtui E, Gruener G, Dockery P. Fitzgerald's Clinical Neuroanatomy and Neuroscience E‐Book. Elsevier; 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 24. Schmahmann JD, Schmahmann J, Pandya D. Fiber pathways of the brain. OUP USA; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Honnedevasthana Arun A, Connelly A, Smith RE, Calamante F. Characterisation of white matter asymmetries in the healthy human brain using diffusion MRI fixel‐based analysis. Neuroimage. 2021;15(225):117505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Büchel C, Raedler T, Sommer M, Sach M, Weiller C, Koch MA. White matter asymmetry in the human brain: a diffusion tensor MRI study. Cereb Cortex. 2004;14(9):945‐951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Malmgren K, Thom M. Hippocampal sclerosis‐‐origins and imaging. Epilepsia. 2012;53(Suppl 4):19‐33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Anderson CT, Sheets PL, Kiritani T, Shepherd GM. Sublayer‐specific microcircuits of corticospinal and corticostriatal neurons in motor cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13(6):739‐744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Broser P, Grinevich V, Osten P, Sakmann B, Wallace DJ. Critical period plasticity of axonal arbors of layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons in rat somatosensory cortex: layer‐specific reduction of projections into deprived cortical columns. Cereb Cortex. 2008;18(7):1588‐1603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Kaneko T, Cho R, Li Y, Nomura S, Mizuno N. Predominant information transfer from layer III pyramidal neurons to corticospinal neurons. J Comp Neurol. 2000;423(1):52‐65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Hooks BM, Papale AE, Paletzki RF, et al. Topographic precision in sensory and motor corticostriatal projections varies across cell type and cortical area. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):3549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Gong G, Jiang T, Zhu C, et al. Asymmetry analysis of cingulum based on scale‐invariant parameterization by diffusion tensor imaging. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005;24(2):92‐98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Thiebaut de Schotten M, Ffytche DH, Bizzi A, et al. Atlasing location, asymmetry and inter‐subject variability of white matter tracts in the human brain with MR diffusion tractography. Neuroimage. 2011;54(1):49‐59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Takao H, Hayashi N, Ohtomo K. White matter microstructure asymmetry: effects of volume asymmetry on fractional anisotropy asymmetry. Neuroscience. 2013;12(231):1‐12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Liu M, Bernhardt BC, Hong SJ, Caldairou B, Bernasconi A, Bernasconi N. The superficial white matter in temporal lobe epilepsy: a key link between structural and functional network disruptions. Brain. 2016;139(Pt 9):2431‐2440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Chang YA, Marshall A, Bahrami N, et al. Differential sensitivity of structural, diffusion, and resting‐state functional MRI for detecting brain alterations and verbal memory impairment in temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2019;60(5):935‐947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Nir TM, Jahanshad N, Villalon‐Reina JE, et al. Effectiveness of regional DTI measures in distinguishing Alzheimer's disease, MCI, and normal aging. Neuroimage Clin. 2013;3:180‐195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Ezzati A, Katz MJ, Lipton ML, Zimmerman ME, Lipton RB. Hippocampal volume and cingulum bundle fractional anisotropy are independently associated with verbal memory in older adults. Brain Imaging Behav. 2016;10(3):652‐659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Saling MM, Berkovic SF, O'Shea MF, Kalnins RM, Darby DG, Bladin PF. Lateralization of verbal memory and unilateral hippocampal sclerosis: evidence of task‐specific effects. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1993;15(4):608‐618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Hermann BP, Seidenberg M, Schoenfeld J, Davies K. Neuropsychological characteristics of the syndrome of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Arch Neurol. 1997;54(4):369‐376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Kucukboyaci NE, Kemmotsu N, Cheng CE, et al. Functional connectivity of the hippocampus in temporal lobe epilepsy: feasibility of a task‐regressed seed‐based approach. Brain Connect. 2013;3(5):464‐474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Nenning KH, Fösleitner O, Schwartz E, et al. The impact of hippocampal impairment on task‐positive and task‐negative language networks in temporal lobe epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol. 2021;132(2):404‐411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Roger E, Pichat C, Torlay L, et al. Hubs disruption in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. A resting‐state fMRI study on a language‐and‐memory network. Hum Brain Mapp. 2020;41(3):779‐796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.