Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 18;13:20406223221081616. doi: 10.1177/20406223221081616

Table 3.

Subgroup analyses of the association between dietary LC n-3 PUFAs intake and risk of HF.

Studies (N) Quintile 5 versus Quintile 1 Per 1 SD increment
HR (95% CI) p value a /I2 HR (95% CI) p value a /I2
Average age (years)
 <60 4 0.84 [0.72, 0.97] 0.98/0% 0.94 [0.89, 0.99] 0.98/0%
 ⩾60 4 0.84 [0.70, 1.01] 0.94 [0.88, 1.00]
Sex
 Female 5 0.91 [0.81, 1.02] 0.28/14.2% 0.98 [0.94, 1.02] 0.16/49.4%
 Male 5 0.83 [0.75, 0.93] 0.94 [0.91, 0.97]
Follow-up duration (years)
 <10 3 0.89 [0.78, 1.03] 0.45/0% 0.96 [0.90, 1.02] 0.36/0%
 ⩾10 5 0.83 [0.75, 0.92] 0.92 [0.88, 0.98]
Measure of exposure
 EPA + DHA 6 0.84 [0.75, 0.95] 0.72/0% 0.94 [0.90, 0.98] 0.73/0%
 EPA + DHA + DPA 2 0.77 [0.49, 1.23] 0.91 [0.77, 1.08]
Region
 Europe 4 0.83 [0.74, 0.93] 0.16/46.1% 0.94 [0.89, 0.98] 0.17/44.2%
 United States 3 0.90 [0.80, 1.02] 0.96 [0.90, 1.02]
 Asia 1 0.58 [0.36, 0.93] 0.82 [0.69, 0.98]

CI, confidence interval; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; DPA, docosapentaenoic acid; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; HF, heart failure; HR, hazard ratio; LC, long chain; PUFAs, polyunsaturated fatty acids; SD, standard deviation.

a

For heterogeneity among subgroups.