Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 28:1–18. doi: 10.1080/10408363.2022.2038539

Table 4.

Effect of comorbidities in humoral response following Pfizer-BioNTech (mRNA BNT162b2) vaccine administration.

Author Country of origin Sample size Median age (range) Measured immunoglobulin % difference of means
Hemodialysis/end-stage renal disease
Jahn et al. [25] Germany Controls (n=16)
HDPs (n = 72)
Controls: 45.5 y/o (39–65)
HDPs: 68 y/o (37–90)
37–59 y/o: 54 y/o (ND)
60–69 y/o: 64.5 y/o (ND)
70–79 y/o: 76 y/o (ND)
80–90 y/o: 82 y/o (ND)
Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG D38
Ab is 44% higher in HCW vs. all HDP
Ab is 21% higher in HCW vs. 37–59 y/o HDP
Ab is 40% higher in HCW vs. 60–69 y/o HDP
Ab is 62% higher in HCW vs. 70–79 y/o HDP
Ab is 66% higher in HCW vs. 80–90 y/o HDP
Ab is 24% higher in 37–59 y/o HDP vs. 60–69 y/o HDP
Ab is 52% higher in 37–59 y/o HDP vs. 70–79 y/o HDP
Ab is 57% higher in 37–59 y/o HDP vs. 80–90 y/o HDP
Ab is 37% higher in 60–69 y/o HDP vs. 70–79 y/o HDP
Ab is 43% higher in 60–69 y/o HDP vs. 80–90 y/o HDP
Ab is 9% higher in 70–79 y/o HDP vs. 80–90 y/o HDP
Goupil et al. [26] Canada Controls (n = 40)
w/o previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 20)
w/ previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 20)
HDPs (n = 150)
w/o previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 131)
w/ previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 19)
Controls
w/o previous SARS-CoV-2 infection: 52 y/o (21–59)
w/ previous SARS-CoV-2 infection: 46 y/o (23–65)
HDPs
w/o previous SARS-CoV-2 infection: 73 y/o (33–92)
w/ previous SARS-CoV-2 infection: 76 y/o (51–90)
Anti-N D21
Controls
IgG is 81% higher in those with previous infection vs. without previous infection
D26
HDP
IgG is 95% higher in those with previous infection vs. without previous infection
D56
HDP
IgG is 96% higher in those with previous infection vs. without previous infection
D21 and D26
IgG is 89% higher in those controls without previous infection vs. HDP without previous infection
IgG is 60% higher in those controls with previous infection vs. HDP with previous infection
Frantzen et al. [27] France HDPs (n = 244) 71 y/o (63–80) Anti-S No control
Zitt et al. [28] Austria Individuals who received the first dose (n = 50)
Individuals who received the second dose (n = 48)
67.6 y/o (ND) Anti-RBD, anti-NTD IgG No control
Torreggiani et al. [29]
France
101
68.89 (ND)
Anti-S IgG
No control
Cancer and autoimmune diseases
Herishanu et al. [30] Israel Total (n = 219)
CLL/SLL
(n = 167)
Only CLL w/ antibody response (n = 52) were compared to controls
Control (n = 52)
Control: 68 y/o (64–74)
CLL/SLL: 71.0 y/o (63.0–76.0)
  D35–42
IgG titer of control is 80.65% higher vs. CLL patients
Pimpinelli et al. [31] Italy Controls (n = 36)
MM (n = 42)
MPM (n = 50)
>80 y/o (ND) Anti-S1/S2 IgG D21
IgG titer of control is 56% higher vs. MM patients
IgG titer of control is 5.26% higher vs. MPM patients
D35
IgG titer of control is 69.8% higher vs. MM patients
IgG titer of control is 51.06% higher vs. MPM patients
Massarweh et al. [32] Israel Controls (n = 78)
Solid tumor patients undergoing active IV anticancer treatment (n = 102)
Control: 62 y/o (49–70)
Solid tumor patients undergoing active IV anticancer treatment: 66 y/o (56–72)
Anti-S-RBD IgG D59–61
IgG titer of control is 68.48% higher vs. cancer patients
Goshen-Lago et al. [33] Israel Controls (n = 261)
Men (n = 118)
Women (n = 143)
Solid tumor patients receiving active intravenous treatment
(n = 232)
Men (n = 132)
Women (n = 100)
Controls: 64 y/o (25–81)
Solid tumor patients receiving active intravenous treatment: 68 y/o (25–88)
Anti-S1/S2 IgG Mean difference could not be computed
Furer et al. [34] Israel Controls (n = 121)
AIIRD
(n = 686)
RA (n = 263)
PsA (n = 165)
AxSpA (n = 68)
SLE (n = 101)
IIM (n = 19)
LVV (n = 21)
ANCA-AAV (n = 26)
Other vasculitis (n = 23)
Controls: 50 y/o (18–90)
AIIRD: 59 y/o (19–88)
RA: 64 y/o (20–88)
PsA: 55 y/o (20–86)
AxSpA: 49.5 y/o (21–83)
SLE: 46 y/o (22–80)
IIM: 64 y/o (34–76)
LVV: 70 y/o (26–85)
AAV: 60.5 y/o (26–85)
Other vasculitis: 56 y/o (19–77)
Anti-S1/S2 IgG D45–D63
Ab titer is 39% higher in controls vs. participants with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases
Ab titer is 50% higher in controls vs. participants with rheumatoid arthritis
Ab titer is 26% higher in controls vs. participants with psoriatic arthritis
Ab titer is 21% higher in controls vs. participants with axial spondyloarthritis
Ab titer is 26% higher in controls than participants with systemic lupus erythematosus
Ab titer is 80% higher in controls vs. participants with idiopathic inflammatory myositis
Ab titer is 34% higher in controls vs. participants with large vessel vasculitis
Ab titer is 82% higher in controls vs. participants with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis
Ab titer is 44% higher in controls vs. participants with other types of vasculitis
Gallo et al. [35] Italy Controls (HCWs) (n = 121)
pwMS on OCR (n = 4)
Controls (HCWs): 41.2 y/o (31.9–55.9)
pwMS
Patient 1: 33 y/o
Patient 2: 35 y/o
Patient 3: 42 y/o
Patient 4: 51 y/o
Anti-S IgG D14
Geometric mean IgG titer is 92% higher in HCW controls vs. patients with multiple sclerosis
D21
Geometric mean IgG titer is 90% higher in HCW controls vs. patients with multiple sclerosis
D28
Geometric mean IgG titer is 97% higher in HCW controls vs. patients with multiple sclerosis

Transplant patients
Korth et al. [36] Germany Controls (HCWs) (n = 23)
Renal transplant patients (n = 23)
Controls (HCWs): 44.4 y/o (ND)
Renal transplant patients:
57.7 y/o (ND)
Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG D36
The IgG titer of control is 92.9% higher than renal transplant patients
Marinaki et al. [37] Greece Controls (HCWs) (n = 116)
SOT patients (n = 34)
Controls (HCWs): ND
SOT patients:
≤60 y/o: (ND)
>60 y/o: (ND)
Anti-SARS-CoV-2-RBD IgG IgG titer post-second dose of BNT162b2 vaccine
Antibody response rate of Control is 41.2% higher vs. solid organ transplants
Shostak et al. [38] Israel 168 60.5 y/o (49.25–67.75) Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG D22–28
IgG titers of previous seropositive individuals is 81.97% higher vs. seronegative individuals
D35–42
IgG titers of previous seropositive individuals is 99.07% higher vs. seronegative individuals
Grupper et al. [39]
Israel
Controls (HCWs) (n = 25)
Kidney transplant patients (n = 136)
Controls (HCWs): 52.7 (ND)
Kidney transplant patients: 58.6 y/o (ND)
Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG
D31–41
IgG titer of control group is 92.49% higher vs. kidney transplant group
Metabolic derangements and smoking
Ríos et al. [6] Spain 134 82.9 y/o (65–99) Anti-S-RBD IgG D43
IgG titer of participants with Charlson index <3 is 30% less vs. with Charlson index ≥3
Pellini et al. [13] Italy 248 47 y/o (18–75) Anti-S1/S2 IgG D28
Ab GMC is 28% higher in underweight vs. normal weight participants
Ab GMC is 51% higher in underweight vs. pre-obese individuals
Ab GMC is 63% higher in underweight vs. obese individuals
Ab GMC is 32% higher in normal weight vs. pre-obese individuals
Ab GMC is 49% higher in normal weight vs. obese individuals
Ab GMC is 25% higher in pre-obese vs. obese individuals
Ab GMC is 44% higher in normotensive vs. hypertensive individuals
Watanabe et al. [40] Italy 86 29 y/o (ND) Anti-S total Ab D28–56
Ab titer is 43% higher in nonsmokers vs. smokers
Ab titer is 66% higher in normotensive vs. hypertensive participants
Ab titer is 71% higher in non-dyslipidemic vs. dyslipidemic participants

ND: no data; HDP: hemodialysis patients; HCW: healthcare workers; CLL: chronic lymphocytic leukemia; SLL: small lymphocytic leukemia; MM: multiple myeloma; MPM: myeloproliferative malignancy; AIIRD: autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic disease; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; PsA: psoriatic arthritis; AxSpA: axial spondyloarthritis; SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus; IIM: idiopathic inflammatory myositis; LVV: large vessel vasculitis; ANCA-AAV: antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis; pwMS: people with multiple sclerosis; OCR: ocrelizumab; SOT: solid organ transplant; GMC: geometric mean concentration.